Trait-Dependent and Site-Specific Effects of Foliar IAA and Kinetin on Two Chickpea Varieties Grown Under Contrasting Conditions
Kebaili, Z.; Yahia, A.; Boultif, A.; Benyamina, A.; Azabi, W.; Remache, S.; Zellagui, A.; Benahmed, M.; gherraf, n.
Show abstract
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield in Algeria still falls short of domestic demand, and low-cost agronomic tools such as plant growth regulators are one of the few levers producers can adjust without heavy investment. We tested the separate and combined effects of foliar-applied indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and kinetin (0, 10, and 20 mg/L) on two chickpea varieties, FLIP 84-92 and ILC 32-79, grown side by side in the field at the ITGC station of El Khroub and in pots at the Institute of Natural Sciences of Oum El Bouaghi during the 2024/2025 season. Nine hormone treatments were applied to each variety at each site, with three replicates apiece. No single treatment came out on top across the board. A20+K20 gave the largest pot leaf area at both sampling dates (5.67 and 7.20 cm2) and the highest field dry matter weight (95.21 g), yet A10+K10 produced the largest field leaf area after the first spray (16.47 cm2) and the highest pot dry matter weight (6.12 g). Kinetin alone at 20 mg/L (K20) gave the most field pods (21.28) and the most field leaves after the first spray (115.41), while A10+K20 gave the heaviest pot grains (100-grain weight of 21.16 g). Field and pot means are not directly comparable given how different the two growing environments and sampling routines were. Between varieties, FLIP 84-92 germinated better (86% vs. 83%) and produced heavier grains, while ILC 32-79 grew taller stems. Because the manuscript we worked from supplied only treatment means, with no replicate-level data or variance estimates, we report these as descriptive numerical differences rather than statistically tested effects. Read that way, the pattern that emerges is that IAA and kinetin responses are trait- and environment-specific rather than uniformly additive, and a properly replicated factorial analysis will be needed before any interaction or synergy between the two hormones can be claimed.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transpiration efficiency variations in the pearl millet reference collection PMiGAP 96%
- Growth behavior and glyphosate resistance level in 10 biotypes of Echinochloa colona in Australia 94%
- The potential of young vegetative quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) as a new sustainable protein-rich winter leafy crop under Mediterranean climate 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-location trials and population-based genotyping reveal high diversity and adaptation to breeding environments in a large collection of red clover 95%
- Photoperiodic Flowering Response of Essential Oil, Grain, and Fiber Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Cultivars 95%
- Trends in stomatal density and size in maize hybrids representing 100 years of long-term breeding for yield 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common, species-specific, and accession-specific responses of foliar phytohormones and morphological traits to drought and herbivory 93%
- Genetic variation for tolerance to the downy mildew pathogen Peronospora variabilis in genetic resources of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) 92%
- Identification of novel genetic regions associated with resistance to European canker in apple 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Wheat developmental traits as affected by the interaction between Eps-7D and temperature under contrasting photoperiods with insensitive Ppd-D1 background 94%
- Assessment of gibberellin (GA4+7) mediated changes on grain filling, hormonal behaviour and antioxidants in high-density maize (Zea Mays L.) 94%
- Can Cynodon dactylon be used to suppress invasive weeds? The effects of density-dependent on the growth and development of Tagetes minuta and Gutenbergia cordifolia 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.