Back

Automated detection of Loa loa: a field trial in Cameroon

Djune-Yemeli, L.; Delahunt, C. B.; Tchana, S. M.; Bopda, J. G.; Balog, Y. A.; Nzeuhang, Y. Y.; Banik, D.; Keller, M. D.; Spencer, E.; de Leon Derby, M. D.; Moussa, Z. L.; Fletcher, D. A.; Bogoch, I. I.; Le-Ny, A.-L. M.; Kamgno, J.

2026-09-03 pathology
10.64898/2026.08.29.745114 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Onchocerciasis (river blindness) is targeted for elimination through mass administration (MDA) of ivermectin (IVM) to endemic populations. In areas where loiasis, caused by the blood-borne filarial parasite Loa loa, is co-endemic, IVM MDA faced significant challenges because individuals harboring more than 30,000 L. loa microfilaria (mf)/mL of blood are at high risk of developing serious adverse events (SAEs) that can sometimes be fatal. An alternative strategy was developed for safe IVM distribution: the so-called 'Test and Not Treat' (TaNT), which identifies and excludes individuals with high mf density from IVM MDA and treats only those with minimal risk. TaNT requires a point-of-care diagnostic device to rapidly quantify L. loa parasites in field conditions. The NTDscope is a handheld device which captures bright-field videos of whole blood in capillaries. An onboard algorithm detects and counts the live microfilaria of L. loa via movement of red blood cells. This paper describes (i) a new detection algorithm; and (ii) a May 2025 field trial in Cameroon using the NTDscope with new algorithm (550 patients). Results for the TaNT use case (i.e. flagging cases with L. loa mf densities > 30,000 mf/mL): 94% to 97% sensitivity, and 94% to 97% specificity. The results indicate that the NTDscope and new algorithm provide a greater margin of safety than the predecessor device, and can potentially offer rapid, effective field detection of high mf infections to enable scalability of the TaNT strategy.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.