From Structural Resources to Latent Protective Capacity: A Bayesian Multilevel Analysis of Flood Exposure and Depressive Symptoms in Indonesia

Communities exposed to flooding can experience markedly different mental health outcomes, yet conventional resilience indicators capture only part of the social and contextual conditions that may explain this variation. This study develops a multilevel and predictive framework for examining community resilience and depressive symptoms following flood exposure in Indonesia. Data were drawn from 20,303 respondents aged 15 years and older nested within 312 communities in the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS-5). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10), with Rasch Partial Credit Model calibration used to examine measurement properties. Bayesian multilevel models quantified between-community heterogeneity and assessed how far observable structural resources accounted for this variation. Community resilience was represented through two complementary constructs: structural resilience, based on observable socioeconomic and social-capital resources, and Latent Community Protective Capacity (LCPC), a model-derived proxy for residual contextual variation in depressive-symptom risk. Approximately 6 percent of variation was attributable to between-community differences, while observable structural resources explained only part of this heterogeneity. Structural resilience and LCPC were weakly correlated (r = 0.155). Moderation analyses provided no clear evidence that structural resilience altered the flood-depression association, while LCPC showed a directionally consistent but uncertain buffering pattern. Predictive models incorporating community-level information improved discrimination, with the best-performing model reaching an ROC-AUC of approximately 0.71. The findings suggest that observable resource-based indices provide an incomplete account of community-level mental health vulnerability and that residual contextual measures may provide complementary information, while requiring cautious interpretation and independent validation.