Pediatric Sleep Assessment through Spectral Sleep Scoring: A Comparison with Polysomnography
Shuster, A. E.; Onton, J. A.; Nakra, N.; Simon, K. C.
Show abstract
Understanding how sleep changes across development requires methods that are both efficient and sensitive to maturational differences in sleep physiology. Spectral sleep scoring is a promising approach, but has primarily been validated in adult populations. This study presents and validates a spectral scoring approach for pediatric sleep. Participants (n = 192; 9 to 18y) completed overnight in-lab sleep studies. Visual scoring was determined by registered polysomnographic technologists and confirmed by board certified sleep physicians following AASM guidelines. Visual stages included: wake, non-rapid eye movement (NREM) stage 1 (N1), NREM stage 2 (N2), NREM stage 3 (N3), and rapid-eye movement (REM) sleep. Spectral activity within each epoch was assessed for the following spectral stages: Wake (40 to 95 Hz), Light (11 to 15.5 Hz), Hi Deep (1 to 3 Hz), Lo Deep (0.1 to 1 Hz), and REM (17 to 26 Hz). Concordance rates were checked across agreement matrices between visual and spectral stages, with expected high agreement between: 1) visual Wake and spectral Wake; 2) visual N2 and spectral Light; 3) visual N3 and spectral HiDeep/LoDeep; and 4) visual REM and spectral REM. Cohens {kappa} was calculated from concordance matrices. There was high agreement between visual and spectral stages (71-89%, {kappa} =.76). Our results provide evidence that spectral scoring is a promising method for efficiently scoring pediatric sleep. Moreover, this method provides additional, clinically relevant information that is not readily captured through traditional visual scoring. This may be particularly valuable for assessing sleep physiology in pediatric clinical populations, where developmental differences in EEG patterns may complicate visual scoring.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Methodological approach to sleep state misperception in insomnia disorder: comparison between multiple nights of actigraphy recordings and a single night of polysomnography recording 95%
- Application of Down-Phase Targeted Auditory Stimulation During Sleep in a Home Setting: A Feasibility Study Across Seven Consecutive Nights 95%
- Effects of one-night partial sleep deprivation on perivascular space volume fraction: Findings from the Stockholm Sleepy Brain Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Looking for a reference for large datasets: relative reliability of visual and automatic sleep scoring 96%
- Subjective sleep onset latency is influenced by sleep structure and body heat loss in human subjects 95%
- The potential of ensemble-based automated sleep staging on single-channel EEG signal from a wearable device 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Home-EEG assessment of possible compensatory mechanisms for sleep disruption in highly irregular shift workers - The ANCHOR study 96%
- A single nucleotide polymorphism in the HOMER1 gene is associated with sleep latency and theta power in sleep electroencephalogram 95%
- Quantitative detection of sleep apnea with wearable watch device 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Dreem headband for sleep staging and EEG spectral analysis in people living with Alzheimer’s and older adults 97%
- Performance of an Electroencephalography-Measuring Headband or Actigraphy Compared with Polysomnography in Older Adults with Sleep Disturbances 95%
- Sustained polyphasic sleep restriction abolishes human growth hormone release 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Topographical relocation of adolescent sleep spindles reveals a new maturational pattern of the human brain 95%
- Is sleep apnea-hypopnea index relevant for impaired brain perfusion and desaturation in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndromes? 94%
- Social context and dominance status contribute to sleep patterns and quality in groups of freely-moving mice 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.