Combining 3D-multispectral and hyperspectral imaging to identify environmental stress treatments imposed during plant growth
Stock, F.; Panda, S.; Poire, R.; Brown, T.; Akram, A.; Zheng, L.; Lei, H.; Zha, R.; Zhao, M.; Isabelle, S.; Martel, M.; Comeau, M.-A.; Hamel, L.-P.; Lavoie, P.-O.; D'Aoust, M. A.; Reithinger, H.; Saxena, P.; Stone, E. A.; Li, H.; Way, D. A.; Atkin, O. K.
Show abstract
Non-invasive, high-throughput phenotyping tools are needed that can identify environmental effects on plant structure and function to diagnose factors responsible for reduced growth in commercial and non-commercial settings. In this study, we explored whether the integration of 3D-multispectral (3D) and 2D-hyperspectral imaging (HSI), aided by machine learning (ML), could be used to identify environmental stress treatments imposed during plant growth. Controlled environment-grown Nicotiana Benthamiana plants were subjected to a range of abiotic treatments - including different growth irradiances, heat treatment and drought stress - with the treatments resulting in differences in shoot height, biomass, leaf area and spectral reflectance. ML models were trained to identify these treatments using morphological and spectral traits measured at 27, 29, 31, and 34 days after sowing (DAS). A 3D-multispectral scanner was used to obtain information on plant height, biomass, and leaf area. A visible and near-infrared (VNIR) HSI camera provided detailed spectral information for deriving spectral indices including the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI) and Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE). Manual measurements provided baseline comparative data. The 3D-multispectral scanner reliably estimated above-ground traits, with high correlations between manual and scanner-derived measurements. The ML models accurately differentiated among environmental stress treatments, with the fused 3D+HSI model achieving the best overall predictive performance across all evaluated metrics compared with models based on either imaging modality alone. Results demonstrated the effectiveness of combining 3D-multispectral and 2D-HSI data with ML analyses for non-destructive, high-throughput phenotyping. The integration of these techniques enabled non-destructive, high-throughput identification of environmental stress treatments imposed during plant growth.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing root phenotyping: Assessing the impact of camera calibration on 3D root reconstruction 95%
- Developmental Normalization of Phenomics Data Generated by High Throughput Plant Phenotyping Systems 94%
- Monitoring of drought stress and transpiration rate using proximal thermal and hyperspectral imaging in an indoor automated plant phenotyping platform 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Suitability of resampled multispectral datasets for mapping flowering plants in the Kenyan savannah 94%
- Open Soil Spectral Library (OSSL): Building reproducible soil calibration models through open development and community engagement 94%
- An evaluation model for aboveground biomass Based on Hyperspectral Data from field and TM8 in Khorchin grassland, China 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Postharvest Senescence in Broccoli Via Hyperspectral Imaging 95%
- SegVeg: Segmenting RGB images into green and senescent vegetation by combining deep and shallow methods 94%
- High-throughput Phenotyping of Soybean Biomass: Conventional Trait Estimation and Novel Latent Feature Extraction Using UAV Remote Sensing and Deep Learning Models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Robustness of high-throughput prediction of leaf ecophysiological traits using near infra-red spectroscopy and poro-fluorometry 93%
- Low-cost, handheld near-infrared spectroscopy for root dry matter content prediction in cassava 93%
- Quantifying Leaf Symptoms of Sorghum Charcoal Rot in Images of Field-Grown Plants 9 Using Deep Neural Networks 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.