Pumping stations negatively affect the distribution of critically endangered European eel (Anguilla anguilla); a landscape-scale study using environmental DNA metabarcoding
Monaghan, A. I. T.; Griffiths, N. P.; Sellers, G. S.; Lawson Handley, L.; Nunn, A. D.; Hänfling, B.; Macarthur, J. A.; Wright, R. M.; Cattaneo, M.; Bolland, J. D.
Show abstract
Context Pumping stations pose a threat to fish globally through land use change, habitat fragmentation and entrainment risk, with the catadromous and critically endangered European eel particularly impacted. Objectives/methods Establish, model, assess and understand the present-day distribution of European eel and resident fishes in 152 pumping station catchments in a once extensive wetland (The Fens) using eDNA metabarcoding (855 samples over two and half years), with specific focus on anthropogenic influences on hydrological connectivity and habitat quality. A removal survey design maximised confidence in negative results while minimising time and consumable costs. Results Eel occurrence upstream of pumping stations was low (occupancy = 28.3%) and positively associated with catchment area, fish species richness and natural hydrological connectivity (gravity drainage or flooding) and negatively associated with distance from the tidal limit. Fish species richness replaced catchment area and improved model performance, potentially acting as a biotic indicator of habitat quality and connectivity. Pumped catchments with manually operated upstream water transfers had reduced eel presence, potentially linked to the direction of water flow or the timing of operation. By contrast, fish species richness increased in these catchments during summer, suggesting displacement into unsuitable long-term habitats. Physical habitat maintenance had no detectable effect on eel occurrence or fish species richness. Conclusions This study provides the first landscape-scale assessment of European eel distribution and drivers of occurrence in pumped river catchments. The highly novel and comprehensive insights have implications for European eel conservation as well as infrastructure and catchment management, including compliance with legislation (EC Regulation No. 1100/2007).
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Agricultural impacts on streams near Nitrate Vulnerable Zones: a case study in the Ebro basin, northern Spain 94%
- Detrital Food Web Drives Aquatic Ecosystem Productivity in a Seasonally Inundated Managed Floodplain 94%
- Bund removal to re-establish tidal flow, remove aquatic weeds and restore coastal wetland services - North Queensland, Australia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Space-time dynamics in monitoring neotropical fish communities using eDNA metabarcoding 95%
- Mapping differences in mammalian distributions and diversity using environmental DNA from rivers 94%
- Impact of Run-of-River Damming on Increasing Phytoplankton Biomass and Species Shift in a Large Amazonian River 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The critical role of natural history museums in advancing eDNA for biodiversity studies: a case study with Amazonian fishes 93%
- Monitoring fish communities through environmental DNA metabarcoding in the fish pass system of the second largest hydropower plant in the world 90%
- Body size variability across habitats in the Brachionus plicatilis cryptic species complex 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Status of aquatic and riparian biodiversity in artificial lake ecosystems with and without management for recreational fisheries: Implications for conservation 94%
- Conservation relevant fine scale distribution and habitat associations of threatened elasmobranchs in temperate nearshore waters 92%
- Improving the monitoring of the invasive Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus): combining environmental DNA and citizen observations 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.