Validation of the Brief-Cope Questionnaire in a Seropositive Rheumatoid Arthritis Population
Iliadis, I.; Heitland, I.; Hoeper, K.; Witte, T.; Kahl, K. G.; Stapel, B.; Meyer-Olson, D.
Show abstract
Objective: The Brief-cope questionnaire explore coping behavior. However, the underlying factor structure remains a subject of ongoing debate. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) conducted across different populations have identified factor solutions ranging from two to fourteen factors. As of yet, the underlying factor structure of the Brief-cope has not been investigated in patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the underlying factor structure of the Brief-cope in a German population of seropositive RA. Methods: 216 outpatients with seropositive RA completed the Brief-cope. An EFA with principal axis factoring and Promax rotation was conducted. Results: EFA indicated a five-factor solution. The five-factor solution explained 51.95% of variance. The identified factors were: (1) problem-focused coping (Cronbach's = .851), (2) emotion-focused coping ( = .754), (3) maladaptive coping ( = .747), (4) religious coping ( = .851), and (5) substance-use coping ( = .869). Conclusion: A five-factor solution provided the most appropriate representation of the underlying factor structure of the Brief-cope in patients with seropositive RA. This factor structure may serve as a suitable basis for future analyses of Brief-cope data in comparable RA populations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index 93%
- Fear among Syrians: a Proposed Cutoff Score and Validation of the Arabic Fear of COVID-19 Scale- A National Survey 92%
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of Physician Global Assessment (PGA) in Systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of its psychometric properties 94%
- Trust in the attending rheumatologist, health-related hope, and medication adherence among Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the TRUMP 2 -SLE project 92%
- Risk of depression, suicidal ideation, suicide and psychosis with hydroxychloroquine treatment for rheumatoid arthritis: a multi-national network cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lowered quality of life in Long COVID is strongly predicted by affective symptoms and chronic fatigue syndrome which are associated with inflammatory processes during the acute infectious phase and consequent neuroimmunotoxic pathways 92%
- Increased prolonged sitting in rheumatoid arthritis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a within-subjects, accelerometer-based study 91%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The self-management support needs of people newly diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis: a realist review protocol 93%
- Experiences and impact of chronic pain in South Africans living in a rural area: a qualitative study 92%
- Translation, adaptation, and measurement properties of the Muscle-Strengthening Exercise Questionnaire among university students in Indonesia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying barriers and facilitators to physical activity for people with scleroderma: A nominal group technique study 91%
- Validation of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) and reference norms in a French-Canadian population with traumatic brain injury receiving rehabilitation 89%
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.