Back

Age and sex alter the immune response in a chronic fibrosis model via changes in T cell and macrophage phenotype

Mejias, J. C.; Ruta, A.; Ramanujam, A. S.; Stivers, K. B.; Kelly, S.; Rutkowski, N.; Krishnan, K.; Davenport Huyer, L.; Cherry, C.; Housseu, F.; Est-Witte, S.; Elisseeff, J. H.

2026-08-28 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.08.27.747581 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The foreign body response (FBR) is an immune mediated event that occurs with every material implant. The extent of the fibrosis is dependent on many factors including the biomaterial design, tissue location, and host factors such as age, sex, ancestry, diet. There are known clinical outcomes of implants dependent on age and sex, including increased fibrosis and implant failure in aged and female patients. As the population ages, there is a growing need to understand how aging affects the FBR, and how preclinical models can capture this to guide biomaterial design. Here, we investigated how chronic fibrosis in a murine model of the FBR is altered by two biological factors: age and sex. We investigated changes in fibrosis using a volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury model coupled with polycaprolactone (PCL) or polyethylene (PE) microparticle implants. Fibrosis was quantified through gene expression, microscopic analysis of histologic sections, and the corresponding immune response measured via gene expression and flow cytometry data. We found gene expression differences with immune pathways enriched in female mice, and microscopy revealed collagen birefringence area increased in young male mice. Both the innate and adaptive immune response were altered by age and sex via T cell and macrophage phenotype, and the effects of aging differed between sexes. These results reveal both variables contribute to discrepant outcomes in both fibrosis and the local immune response to synthetic material implants. This demonstrates a clear need to understand and account for the influence of biological factors in biomaterial design.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.