Back

Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS)-dECM Bioink with Extrusion-Induced Collagen Organization for Tympanic Membrane Tissue Engineering

John, E. T.; Thirumalai, D.; Kundanati, L.; Natesan, S.

2026-08-27 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.08.27.745367 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tympanic membrane perforations remain a common clinical problem, and although surgical intervention through tympanoplasty achieves high success rates, it is associated with donor-site morbidity, surgical complexity and limited restoration of the native radial and circumferential collagen architecture. In this study, 3D extrusion printing was utilized to create an active scaffold and attempt to promote collagen organization through shear-mediated structural alignment. An alginate-carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) hydrogel with bovine SIS-dECM was prepared and investigated for its suitability as a bioink alternative to tympanoplasty grafts. The physiochemical, rheological and printability characteristics of the hydrogel were assessed. Successful decellularization was confirmed by histological analysis. The incorporation of the SIS-dECM into the hydrogel led to increased swelling, lower apparent viscosity, yield stress and flow stress while maintaining favourable printability and filament stability. Polarized optical microscopy was also used to study the influence of printing speed on the alignment of collagen to mimic the native tympanic membrane radial collagen architecture. Compared with the cast controls, the printed samples presented stronger birefringence signals. Biological evaluation demonstrated that the 15% dECM hydrogel exhibited the highest live cell area percentage and live/dead ratio after 48 h. In addition, the chick chorioallantoic membrane assay demonstrated that the dECM-containing hydrogels improved vascular density. The findings establish a printable, biologically active dECM bioink capable of generating bulk collagen organization through extrusion printing as a platform for tympanic membrane regeneration.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.