Epigenetic and Immunometabolic Signatures of Suicidal Behavior in Major Depressive Disorder
SHA, Q.; Escobar Galvis, M. L.; Madaj, Z.; Fu, Z.; Sheldon, R. D.; Cave, T.; Adams, M.; Isaguirre, C.; Smart, L.; Kassien, J.; Triche, T.; Fondufe-Mittendorf, Y.; Youssef, N. A.; Achtyes, E. D.; Mann, J. J.; Brundin, L. C.
Show abstract
Suicidal behavior results from complex behavioral and biological changes. Previous cross-sectional studies indicate that proinflammatory immunobiological factors are often increased in close temporal proximity to a suicide attempt. Suicidal individuals may also exhibit a biological trait vulnerability to stress and inflammation, due to persistent epigenetic modifications. We enrolled 130 individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD), 83 with suicidal behavior at intake, and followed them for 12 months with up to eight clinical assessments. Quantification of plasma inflammatory markers and metabolites was performed by high-sensitivity electrochemiluminescence and Ultra High-Performance-Liquid-Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS), respectively. Epigenetic changes were identified using Illumina EPIC arrays. We identified 15 genes with altered DNA-methylation associated with suicidal behavior and attempts at baseline. Childhood trauma predicted lifetime suicide attempts and was associated with altered methylation of seven genes. Increased neutrophils and lower plasma serotonin at baseline predicted future suicide attempts over the following year (neutrophil estimate = 0.42, P = 0.016; serotonin OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39-1.13). Utilizing biomarkers from baseline and epigenetic data from the genes with highest predictive values (STBD1 ,PRDM8, and TRIM15), we achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 for suicide attempts over the year. Suicidal behavior in MDD was associated with specific epigenetic signatures. Several of the identified genes, such as MAD1L1, have been implicated in psychiatric disease, suicidal behavior and the immune response. These findings support the usefulness of epigenetic and immunometabolic blood markers for identifying suicidal individuals in clinical settings, potentially enhancing preventative efforts.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Acylcarnitines metabolism in depression: association with diagnostic status, depression severity and symptom profile in the NESDA cohort 95%
- Applying Machine-Learning and Deep-Learning to Predict Depression from Brain MRI and Identify Depression-Related Brain Biology 94%
- Serum Metabolites Associated with Depression and Anxiety in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunometabolic Blood Biomarkers of Developmental Trajectories of Depressive Symptoms: Findings From the ALSPAC Birth Cohort 94%
- Structural brain alterations associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people: results across 21 international studies from the ENIGMA Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviours consortium 94%
- The genomic basis of mood instability: identification of 46 loci in 363,705 UK Biobank participants, genetic correlation with psychiatric disorders, and association with gene expression and function. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acylcarnitine Metabolomic Profiles Inform Clinically-Defined Major Depressive Phenotypes 94%
- Neurocognitive deficits, psychotrauma, and inflammation shape major depressive disorder and its phenome features 93%
- Glycoprotein Acetyls and Depression: testing for directionality and potential causality using longitudinal data and Mendelian randomization analyses 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissecting depression symptoms: multi-omics clustering uncovers immune-related subgroups and cell-type specific dysregulation 94%
- Blood Immuno-metabolic Biomarker Signatures of Depression and Affective Symptoms in Young Adults 94%
- Metabolomic and Inflammatory Signatures of Symptom Dimensions in Major Depression 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.