PCGS: biomarker and risk group identification for Pediatric Cancers via explainable Graph neural networks with Shapley values
Shi, Z.; Budhkar, A.; Amin, W.; Pollok, K. E.; Su, J.; Huang, K.
Show abstract
Improvements in data availability, sharing, and integration, together with the development of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques, are advancing precision medicine for pediatric cancer by facilitating diagnosis, biomarker discovery, and drug development. Data sharing commons and initiatives like the Childhood Cancer Data Initiative (CCDI) provide access to pediatric-specific genomic and clinical data cohorts and improve data availability for pediatric cancer research. Based on CCDI, a scalable AI platform, Graph Artificial Intelligence for Pediatric Oncology (GAIPO), integrates various data modalities from bulk and single-cell omics data to clinical information. Such multi-modal data facilitates the training and development of advanced XAI models for pediatric cancers. We then developed an end-to-end multi-modality framework, PCGS, for pediatric cancer by incorporating omics-specific representation learning via GNN models with cross-attention fusion and multi-objective learning for downstream tasks such as classification, clustering, and survival analysis. This framework outperforms previous supervised multi-omics integration baseline approaches based on glioma and Wilms tumor cohorts and enables GNN model explainability via Shapley value-based feature attribution approaches to explain the contributions of gene-level features across various biomedical tasks, including classification and survival. Given specific background samples (e.g., age groups, sex, grades) as baselines, this explainable GNN model estimates and ranks the importance scores for input features from each omics modality. It identifies background-specific key features for biomarker discovery, risk group identification, and survival analysis in glioma and Wilms tumor, with potential applicability to other pediatric cancers.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Features fusion or not: harnessing multiple pathological foundation models using Meta-Encoder for downstream tasks fine-tuning 95%
- MORONET: Multi-omics Integration via Graph Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Data Classification 94%
- Knowledge Connector: Decision support system for multiomics-based precision oncology 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- MOH: a novel multilayer multi-omics heterogeneous graph for single-cell clustering 93%
- A Transformer-Based Model Trained on Large Scale Claims Data for Prediction of Severe COVID-19 Disease Progression 93%
- GREMI: an Explainable Multi-omics Integration Framework for Enhanced Disease Prediction and Module Identification 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- MultiSurv: Long-term cancer survival prediction using multimodal deep learning 93%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Inferred from Pathology Whole-Slide Images Links Tumor Heterogeneity to Survival in Breast and Lung Cancer 93%
- Generalising uncertainty improves accuracy and safety of deep learning analytics applied to oncology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Bi-level Graph Learning Unveils Prognosis-Relevant Tumor Microenvironment Patterns in Breast Multiplexed Digital Pathology 93%
- Obtaining Spatially Resolved Tumor Purity Maps Using Deep Multiple Instance Learning In A Pan-cancer Study 92%
- Generating hard-to-obtain information from easy-to-obtain information: applications in drug discovery and clinical inference 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.