Global Adoption of openEHR Clinical Data Repositories: A Vendor and Community Survey
Kohler, S.; Meyer-Eschenbach, F.; Michelena, X.; Marschollek, M.; Eils, R.
Show abstract
The openEHR standard provides an open, vendor-neutral architecture for clinical data repositories (CDRs), yet its real-world deployment has not been systematically documented. We conducted a dual-perspective survey combining a vendor survey of openEHR CDR providers with a community survey of openEHR practitioners. Eleven vendor organisations reported deployments across 22 countries and over 100 institutions and health regions. A complementary community survey (n=29, 17 countries) provided context on regulatory environments, adoption drivers, and barriers. Combined, the surveys cover 28 countries, 26 of them with a reported openEHR CDR deployment. Three findings emerge: openEHR has achieved national-scale presence through two distinct channels. Through vendor-market convergence, openEHR-based systems cover the majority of regional health authorities without a national mandate, including 19 of 21 Swedish regions, 3 of 4 Norwegian health regions, and 16 of 21 Finnish wellbeing services counties. Through national health record adoption, governments have built or procured national systems on openEHR as their technical foundation, including Ireland, Malta, Greece, Jamaica and Slovenia. Across Europe, this constitutes an openEHR-based interoperability infrastructure already in place across multiple EU member states. We identified no country in which openEHR is named in binding national regulation, creating structural fragility and an unrealised opportunity for alignment with the European Health Data Space (EHDS). Second, 61% of deployments serve primary use only, and 12% support both primary and secondary use. Third, lack of openEHR-specific knowledge is the most consistent adoption barrier across all geographies and deployment tiers. Adoption is driven by practitioner need and innovation, not by regulatory mandate.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- FHIR-DHP: A Standardized Clinical Data Harmonisation Pipeline for scalable AI application deployment 93%
- Is the quality of hospital EHR data sufficient to evidence its ICHOM outcomes performance in heart failure? A pilot evaluation 93%
- Can we trust the prediction model? Demonstrating the importance of external validation by investigating the COVID-19 Vulnerability (C-19) Index across an international network of observational healthcare datasets 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study 92%
- Enhancing Uploads of Health Data in the Electronic Health Record - The Role of Framing and Length of Privacy Information 91%
- A digital self-care intervention for Ugandan patients with heart failure and their clinicians: User-centred design and usability study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Design and Implementation of an End-to-End AI-Driven Colonoscopy Recall Workflow at Scale 94%
- Transforming Estonian health data to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model: lessons learned 94%
- Understanding Data Differences across the ENACT Federated Research Network 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.