The impact of London's Ultra Low Emission Zone on respiratory prescribing: a synthetic control study
Williams, G. H.; Allen, T.
Show abstract
Urban air pollution remains a significant public health concern, contributing to premature deaths and adverse health outcomes. However, there is little causal research evaluating the effectiveness of policies designed to improve air quality. This study assesses the impact of all three stages of London's Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) on air pollution, via PM2.5 levels, and respiratory health, via prescription records for bronchodilator and respiratory corticosteroid medications. Analyses are at general practice level, using a generalised synthetic control method to estimate causal impacts. Stage 1 was associated with a statistically significant but negligible 0.77% reduction in PM2.5 levels, with no corresponding change in prescribing. Stage 2 produced a paradoxical 2.69% increase in PM2.5, alongside a 4.44% decrease in inhaled corticosteroid quantity but a 12.51% increase in average daily quantity (ADQ) usage, suggesting a worsening of disease severity among existing patients. Stage 3 yielded a 2.69% PM2.5 reduction and a modest 2.18% decrease in bronchodilator ADQ usage. Spillover effects beyond the ULEZ boundary were statistically significant, but negligible. We find overall that the ULEZ had minimal effects on both air quality and respiratory prescribing across all three stages. These findings provide new insights into the effectiveness of ULEZ policies in reducing air pollution and its associated health impacts, suggesting the zone's effects are considerably smaller than previously reported, and that integration with broader policy measures may be necessary to achieve meaningful public health gains.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Links between air pollution and COVID-19 in England 96%
- Do improved biomass cookstove interventions improve indoor air quality and blood pressure? A systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Long-term air pollution and other risk factors associated with COVID-19 at the census-tract-level in Colorado 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Potential Health Benefits of Eliminating Traffic Emissions in Urban Areas 96%
- Evaluating the impact of Hazelwood mine fire event on students’ educational development with Bayesian interrupted time-series hierarchical meta-regression 93%
- Prenatal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and birth outcomes in a pregnancy cohort in Nairobi, Kenya. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term effects of a coalmine fire on hospital and ambulance use: an interrupted time series study 93%
- Long-Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter, Lung Function and Cognitive Performance: A Prospective Dutch Cohort Study on the Underlying Routes 93%
- Brick kiln pollution and its impact on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term exposure to air-pollution and COVID-19 mortality in England: a hierarchical spatial analysis 96%
- Estimation of airborne viral emission: quanta emission rate of SARS-CoV-2 for infection risk assessment 92%
- In vitro genotoxic and mutagenic potentials of combustion particles from marine fuels with different sulfur contents 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of banning smoking in cars with children on exposure to second-hand smoke: a natural experiment in England and Scotland 91%
- Asthma hospitalisations and heat exposure in England: A case-crossover study during 2002-2019 89%
- Aerosol emission from the respiratory tract: an analysis of relative risks from oxygen delivery systems 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.