Automated hippocampal sclerosis detection, using AID-HS, shows robust performance across multi-centre paired 7T and 3T MRI
Kronlage, C.; Ripart, M.; Piper, R. J.; Tisdall, M. M.; Carmichael, D. W.; Baldeweg, T.; Duncan, J. S.; O'Muircheartaigh, J.; Eriksson, M. H.; Casella, C.; Bridgen, P.; Bauer, T.; Bouschery, S. R.; Lange, A.; Pracht, E. D.; Stocker, T.; Surges, R.; Ruber, T.; Klodowski, K.; Rodgers, C. T.; Cope, T. E.; Wagstyl, K.; Adler, S.
Show abstract
Background: Hippocampal sclerosis (HS) is a common cause of drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE) and amenable to neurosurgical treatment. Detection relies on MRI but can be challenging. 7 Tesla (T) ultra-high field MRI and automated MRI post-processing tools have independently been shown to improve radiological diagnosis of HS. However, combining these approaches remains underexplored. This study evaluated whether AID-HS, a tool for HS detection developed using 3T MRI, generalises to 7T MRI data. Methods: We collated a dataset of paired 3T and 7T T1-weighted MRI from four epilepsy centres, including 23 patients with HS, 39 healthy controls, and 23 individuals with focal cortical dysplasia as disease controls. Histopathology served as the gold standard for defining HS where available (n=7), otherwise radiological findings (n=16). AID-HS was applied to images acquired at both field strengths, and sensitivity and specificity for detection and lateralisation of HS were compared. Additionally, agreement of hippocampal features across 3T and 7T was evaluated. Results: We found no evidence of a difference in performance of AID-HS between 3T and 7T. Sensitivity for detection of unilateral HS was 63% (12/19) at 3T and 68% (13/19) at 7T (McNemar's exact test p=1.0). Specificity in controls was 97% (60/62) at 3T and 100% (62/62) at 7T (p=0.5). Bilateral HS was correctly flagged in 3 of 4 cases using feature-based criteria, with high specificity in controls. Quantitative hippocampal features showed moderate to good agreement across field strengths (ICC 0.70 to 0.98), with small differences observed for volume and thickness estimates. Conclusion: AID-HS provides robust detection and lateralisation of HS across multiple 7T MRI centres, highlighting its potential to enhance lesion detection. Future work is needed to investigate whether models trained on 7T data can leverage the improved image quality for further gains in HS detection performance.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of spatial sampling on network alterations in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Can routine EEG be enough? 93%
- Detection of cognitive deficits years prior to clinical diagnosis across neurological conditions 92%
- Brain network changes after the first seizure: an insight into medication response? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The Role of the Temporal Pole in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Study 94%
- Histological correlates of hippocampal magnetization transfer images in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy patients 94%
- High interictal connectivity within the resection zone is associated with favorable post-surgical outcomes in focal epilepsy patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Internal and External Validation of Comprehensive High-Frequency Activity Biomarkers for Epilepsy Surgery 93%
- The proportion of seizure onset zone contacts resected is not associated with outcome following SEEG-guided resective epilepsy surgery in children 92%
- Ambulatory Video EEG extended to 10 days: A retrospective review of a large database of ictal events 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Probabilistic comparison of gray and white matter coverage between depth and surface intracranial electrodes in epilepsy: a patient-specific modeling and empirical study 91%
- Dynamic network properties of the interictal brain determine whether seizures appear focal or generalised 90%
- Functional Network Connectivity Imprint In Febrile Seizures 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.