Back

MetaDome 2027: a comprehensively updated resource for aggregating missense variant evidence across homologous human protein domains

Wiel, L.; Ferraro, F.; Yu, J.; Zhen, J.; Nachun, D.; Mendez, R.; Reuter, C. M.; Cui, J. L.; Bonner, D. E.; Carter, J. N.; Marwaha, S.; van de Vorst, M.; Emami, S.; Kravets, E.; Neu, M. B.; van Ham, T. W.; Kleefstra, T.; Ashley, E. A.; Bernstein, J. A.; Montgomery, S. B.; Gilissen, C.; Wheeler, M. T.

2026-08-31 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.26.747388 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The interpretation of missense variants remains a major challenge in clinical genetics. "Meta-domains" aggregate population and pathogenic variation across homologous Pfam domain instances in the human proteome, providing per-residue context for interpreting variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Our 2019 implementation, MetaDome, is widely used and named in clinical variant-classification guidelines. Here we present the MetaDome 2027 update, featuring a comprehensively updated dataset and GRCh38 support. The redesigned pipeline enables incremental updates of GENCODE, UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, Pfam, gnomAD, and ClinVar while maintaining 100% sequence-identity gene-to-protein mapping. Annotated Pfam domain instances grew 14.9% from 71,419 to 82,069 and meta-domain-eligible Pfam families ([≥]2 human occurrences) by 73.3% from 3,334 to 5,778; Pfam domains are annotated to 92% of human proteins. Approximately 43% of mapped protein-coding nucleotides (14.3 million in GRCh38, 13.8 million in GRCh37) are in a meta-domain; in GRCh38 67.9% (37,692 of 55,548) of pathogenic or likely pathogenic ClinVar missense variants fall at such a position. We show how MetaDome helped reclassify a de novo missense VUS in RALA and identify 52,463 ClinVar missense VUS for which meta-domains supply otherwise unavailable pathogenic evidence. MetaDome is freely available at www.metadome.app.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.