From TD50 to Benchmark Dose in Nitrosamine Risk Assessment: Evidence from N-Nitrosotrimetazidine Carcinogenicity and TGR Mutation Data.
Leheup, M. F.; Johnson, G.; Kirkland, D.; Pasello dos Santos, F.; Mueller, S.; Weaver, R.; Griffon, A.
Show abstract
The presence of N-nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs) in pharmaceuticals represents a significant regulatory and safety challenge due to their classification as "cohort of concern" compounds. This paper describes the toxicological evaluation of N-Nitrosotrimetazidine (NTMZ), performed to refine the initial default acceptable intake (AI) limits of 18 to 26.5 ng/day established by regulatory authorities. The evaluation followed a tiered approach: NTMZ was first confirmed as mutagenic in vitro via the standard Ames test. To further investigate its genotoxic potential, two in vivo studies were conducted in Wistar and transgenic rats. Detection of DNA strand breaks in the liver and duodenum (comet assay) together with positive results in the cII mutation assay confirmed an in vivo mutagenic mode of action. Benchmark Dose (BMD) analysis of the transgenic rat data yielded a BMDL50 of 7 mg/kg/day in the male liver. To characterize long-term carcinogenic risk, a GLP-compliant 2-year carcinogenicity study was conducted in Wistar rats. Chronic exposure induced dose-dependent increases in liver tumors (hemangiosarcomas, hepatocellular carcinomas and adenomas) and intestinal tumors (adenomas and adenocarcinomas), leading to a Tumor Dose 50 (TD50) of 23 mg/kg/day in male rats. Benchmark dose analysis of tumor incidence identified a lowest BMDL10 of 2.6 mg/kg/day in females, which served as the basis for deriving an AI of 13 microg/day. This assessment demonstrates a strong predictive correlation between the BMD derived from the in vivo transgenic model, the BMDL10 and the final TD50 values obtained in the 2-year carcinogenicity study. These findings provided the scientific basis for establishing a conservative AI of 13 microg/person/day based on the BMDL10 and further support the regulatory acceptance and use of BMD-derived approaches for the evaluation of nitrosamine impurities.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mutagenic and carcinogenic potency determinations for NDMA support the cumulative dose assumption underpinning the less-than-lifetime Threshold of Toxicological Concern 96%
- Tat_BioV: Tattoo ink exposure and biokinetics of selected tracers in a short-term quasi-experimental clinical study of 24 subjects 94%
- High-throughput PBK modelling for dermal exposure: a pragmatic approach to predict systemic pharmacokinetics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of tobacco-specific carcinogen protein adducts. 92%
- A Method To Calibrate Chemical Agnostic Quantitative Adverse Outcome Pathways On Multiple Chemical Dose-Response Data 92%
- Cell Painting and chemical structure read-across can complement each other for rat acute oral toxicity prediction in chemical early de-risking 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How important are concurrent vehicle control groups in (sub)chronic non-human primate toxicity studies conducted in pharmaceutical development? An opportunity to reduce animal numbers 94%
- In-Vivo and In-Vitro Toxicity Evaluation of 2,3-Dimethylquinoxaline: an Antimicrobial Found in a Traditional Herbal Medicine 93%
- UV-C decontamination for N95 emergency reuse: Quantitative dose validation with photochromic indicators 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Planarian behavioral screening is a useful invertebrate model for evaluating seizurogenic chemicals 91%
- Diesel exhaust particles induce lasting and age-dependent damage to the brain in Drosophila melanogaster 91%
- Repeated exposure to chlorpyrifos is associated with a dose-dependent chronic neurobehavioral deficit in adult rats 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.