Factors associated with the use of Long Acting Reversible Contraceptives among adolescents at first level hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia.

Background: Unintended adolescent pregnancies remain a public health challenge in Zambia, where LARC use is low despite their effectiveness. Barriers such as stigma, misconceptions, and limited access persist. Previous studies conducted in Lusaka district did not explore the challenges faced by adolescents in trying to access and use LARCs. Understanding these challenges is crucial for developing targeted interventions to promote safe and effective contraception practices. This study examined factors influencing adolescent knowledge, willingness, and uptake of LARCs in public health facilities in Lusaka. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2024 and March 2025 among adolescent girls aged 15-19 years in five first-level hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia, using structured questionnaires to obtain quantitative data1. LARC use was measured as a binary outcome, with multiple regression identifying associated factors. Results: There were 400 participants in total, of whom 48% (181/376) had ever used a LARC. In the adjusted model, age was significantly associated with LARC use (AOR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11-1.77; p < 0.001). Adolescents who were willing to delay pregnancy had markedly higher odds of using LARCs (AOR = 7.46, 95% CI: 1.42-39.06; p = 0.017). Knowledge of LARCs remained a strong independent predictor, more than doubling the likelihood of uptake (AOR = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.12-6.46; p = 0.027). Having children was also significantly associated with higher LARC use (AOR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.11-6.23; p = 0.029), while participants with unknown HIV status had lower odds of LARC use (AOR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10-0.97; p = 0.044). In addition, adolescents residing in Chipata had substantially higher odds of LARC uptake compared to those in Kanyama (AOR = 317.93, 95% CI: 35.01-2887.2; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The findings indicate that age, knowledge of LARCs, reproductive experience (having children), and willingness to delay pregnancy were significantly associated with higher odds of LARC uptake, and almost half of the participants had already used a LARC method. Although higher education showed an upward trend, it was not statistically significant in the adjusted model. Limited awareness and variability in service delivery across clinics highlight the need for strengthened counseling and reliable access to LARCs. As this study focused only on adolescents already attending Family Planning Clinics, further research is needed to assess LARC availability, accessibility, and quality of counseling across different settings in Zambia.