Evaluation of the Safe Recovery Program to reduce falls in older people in hospital: Protocol for a multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.
Hill, A.-M.; Morris, M. E.; Flicker, L.; Etherton-Beer, C.; Semciw, A.; McPhail, S. M.; Said, C. M.; Shorr, R. I.; Bulsara, C.; Harding, K.; Page, A. T.; Rasmussen, B.; Bulsara, M.; Heng, H.; Francis-Coad, J.; Mace, K.; Woltsche, R.; Hahn, K.-A.; Phan, U.; Watson, C.; Peterson, S.; Campbell, D.; Haines, T.
Show abstract
Background Falls in hospitals are associated with injuries, deaths and poor patient outcomes. Although clinical guidelines recommend educating hospital patients about how to prevent falls, not all hospitals systematically deliver evidence-based patient falls education. The primary aim of this study is to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of delivering a research-informed education program called the Safe Recovery Program with ward support on rates of falls and falls-related injuries in hospitals. The secondary aims include measuring changes in patient and staff knowledge and awareness about falls prevention and identifying barriers and facilitators to staff and patients taking action to reduce hospital falls. Methods The trial will adhere to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. Twelve wards will be recruited from five Australian hospitals over a 65-week period. A stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial design will be used with unidirectional crossover from control to experimental conditions together with randomisation of when each cluster makes the transition. The crossovers will occur at 12 timepoints, each five weeks apart. Alongside the trial, patients and staff on participating wards will be recruited for interviews and qualitative data analyses will be conducted to understand how to optimise implementation. The experimental condition involves usual care plus delivery of the Safe Recovery Program. For the Safe Recovery Program, supervised allied health assistants will deliver brief falls education programs to all suitable patients in designated wards, reinforced by all ward staff. Falls champions, who are registered nurses and allied health professionals, will provide Safe Recovery Program training for staff, using a train-the-trainer model. The ward staff will also be trained in how to support hospital patients to adopt safe behaviours. The primary outcome will be falls per 1000 patient bed days. The secondary outcomes will be: (i) injurious falls per 1000 patient bed days (ii) patient and staff changes in falls awareness, knowledge and motivation; and (iii) barriers and enablers to hospital staff engaging in behaviour change and program implementation. An economic evaluation will also be conducted to estimate the incremental cost effectiveness of implementing the Safe Recovery intervention. Ethics and Dissemination Ethics approvals have been obtained from The Royal Melbourne Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/113864/MH-2024). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, workshops and conferences. Consumer team investigators will guide the communication of findings to the target audiences, including older patients, hospital staff, healthcare managers and policy makers. Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12624001469505
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Home-based Extended Rehabilitation for Older People with Frailty (HERO): a Randomised Controlled Trial 95%
- Preventable deaths involving falls in England and Wales, 2013-2022: a systematic case series of coroners’ reports 94%
- Changes in health and functioning of care home residents over two decades: what can we learn from population based studies? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of 12 weeks of Multi-nutrient supplementation on the Immune and Musculoskeletal systems of Older Adults in Aged-Care (The Pomerium Study): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 93%
- Association between older patients receiving geriatric co-management at the emergency department and acute hospital admissions compared to usual care: an observational, controlled study. 93%
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 96%
- Effectiveness of dyadic interventions in improving outcomes for adults with multiple long-term conditions and/or frailty and their informal carers: A systematic review protocol 93%
- Validity of the German version of the Stay Independent Questionnaire applied by telephone interview: A diagnostic accuracy study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-time Auditory Feedback for Improving Gait and Walking in People with Parkinson’s Disease: A Pilot and Feasibility Trial 92%
- A Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in South Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study 91%
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older adults: An umbrella review 95%
- Effect of a simple exercise programme on hospitalisation-associated disability in older patients: a randomised controlled trial. 94%
- Frailty and mortality in hospitalized older adults with COVID-19: retrospective observational study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.