Back

Frontostriatal interactions and socioenvironmental associations with alcohol and cannabis onset in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study

Thiessen, K. A.; Breslin, F. J.; Kerr, K. L.

2026-08-31 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.08.26.26360720 medRxiv
Show abstract

Adolescent substance use is a major public health concern due to increased risk of future physical and mental health conditions. Fronto-striatal functioning - particularly regarding inhibition and reward processing - may increase vulnerability to high-risk substance use. However, it remains unclear if these neurobiological differences precede substance use or are consequences of it. The ongoing Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study follows over 10000 youth, offering an unprecedented opportunity to longitudinally examine substance use patterns throughout development. We utilized family-clustered time-varying Cox proportional hazard models to prospectively examine main and interaction effects of right Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG) inhibitory control and bilateral nucleus accumbens (NAc) reward response, alongside early life adversity and peer substance use as predictors of alcohol and cannabis onset in the ABCD Study. We identified a significant crossover interaction such that left NAc activity had a slight positive association with first full alcoholic drink in the context of higher right IFG activity but a negative association in the context of lower right IFG activity. However, peer alcohol and cannabis use emerged as the strongest predictors of outcomes. Alcohol onset was also more common in females, and early life adversity was associated only with cannabis onset. Findings indicate that interactions between inhibition- and reward-related brain regions may impact risk for early substance use onset, but these effects may be modest relative to socioenvironmental factors. Additionally, divergent alcohol and cannabis findings suggest that risk profiles are substance specific. Peer-focused strategies should be considered in preventive efforts.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.