Back

Activity-resolved microbial community profiling using rpoB gene and transcript sequencing

Cholet, F.; Sloan, W.; Smith, C. J.

2026-08-25 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.25.746930 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Determining which members of a microbial community are metabolically active remains a central challenge in microbial ecology. Although the 16S rRNA gene is the dominant marker for bacterial community profiling, it cannot reliably distinguish active cells from dormant or dead populations. As a result, complementary phylogenetic markers whose transcript abundance more closely reflects cellular activity are needed. Here, we systematically evaluated 80 Bacterial protein-coding marker genes and identified rpoB, encoding the beta subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase, as the optimal candidate. We designed a new primer pair (1528F 2041R) from a curated database of 305,274 unique rpoB sequences and validated it for quantitative PCR and amplicon sequencing of DNA and RNA templates. The rpoB qPCR assay achieved a limit of quantification two orders of magnitude lower than the benchmark 16S rRNA assay, for which a limit of detection could not be determined because of no-template-control amplification. In soil and sediment communities, rpoB recovered community composition comparable to 16S rRNA while providing a quantitative activity signal: rpoB cDNA:DNA ratios correlated significantly with taxon-level transcript abundance (R squared between 0.22 and 0.29, p < 0.001), whereas 16S rRNA ratios did not (p > 0.5). In a biological activated carbon biofilter experiment, rpoB transcript abundance tracked the decline in dissolved organic carbon removal rates across a 72 hour time series (correlation coefficients between 0.84 and 0.99), whereas 16S rRNA transcripts were uninformative (correlation coefficients between -0.4 and 0.98). These results establish rpoB as a quantitatively robust, activity-responsive complement to 16S rRNA for linking community composition to ecosystem processes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.