Back

Pallidal beta oscillations underlying locomotor adaptation in Parkinsons disease

Choi, J. T.; Gurrala, A.; Wang, D. D.; de Hemptinne, C.; Wong, J. K.

2026-09-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.25.744491 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLocomotor adaptation is essential for adjusting walking patterns to complex environments. This study investigated locomotor adaptation deficits in people with Parkinsons disease (PD) and examined oscillatory activity in the globus pallidus internus (GPi) during walking adaptation. We hypothesized that elevated beta-band activity in the GPi is associated with reduced locomotor adaptability in PD. MethodsTwelve PD patients with GPi deep brain stimulation (DBS) (eleven bilateral and one unilateral) were included. Local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded from DBS electrodes during split-belt treadmill walking. Patients were tested in the medication-off, DBS-off state. Locomotor adaptation was measured as the change in step length asymmetry during split-belt walking, with smaller changes indicating greater adaptation deficits. ResultsWe found that GPi high beta (20-30 Hz) and low gamma (30-60 Hz) oscillations were modulated during split-belt walking. Compared to adapters, non-adapters showed decreased movement-related beta suppression during walking. Across participants, beta activity in the GPi contralateral to the fast leg was negatively associated with adaptation magnitude (Spearmans {rho} = -0.65 to -0.75). ConclusionsGPi oscillations are dynamically modulated during locomotor adaptation in PD. Increased beta activity may underlie impaired sensorimotor adaptation during walking. These findings provide novel insight into basal ganglia mechanisms of gait adaptation in PD and suggest that elevated GPi beta activity may serve as a marker of locomotor adaptation deficits.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.