Back

TaHL-PTM: Post-Translational Modification Prediction in Proteins via Target-Hooked Discriminative Fine-Tuning of Decoder-only Protein Language Models

Prasain, B.; Pratyush, P.; Schulze, S.; KC, D. B.

2026-08-27 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.24.746791 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) regulate protein function, making accurate residue-level PTM prediction essential for understanding cellular mechanisms and disease pathways. While decoder-only protein language models (PLMs) pretrained with the causal language modeling (CLM) objective have driven breakthroughs across various bioinformatics tasks, their potential for PTM prediction remains largely underexplored. CLM-based PLMs that rely on Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) for tokenization, such as ProtGPT2, introduce intra-token label collision by merging multiple amino acids with conflicting labels into a single token, creating a major bottleneck for residue-level tasks. To overcome this, we propose TaHL-PTM (Target-Hooked Low-rank adaptation for PTM prediction), a novel framework that integrates target-hooked tokenization with site-directed discriminative LoRA fine-tuning. Target-hooked tokenization constrains tokenization around the candidate residue using dedicated marker tokens to eliminate intra-token label collision while preserving the surrounding sequence context, whereas the proposed discriminative objective repurposes the standard generative CLM objective for residue-level PTM classification by directly optimizing the separation between modified and unmodified sites. We benchmark TaHL-PTM across six distinct PTM tasks on ProtGPT2 and ProGen2 models. TaHL-PTM consistently improves MCC, with the largest gain of up to +0.11 for tyrosine phosphorylation (0.34 to 0.45), alongside improvements in F1, AUROC, and AUPR. Performance gains are more pronounced for collision-affected samples, validating the effectiveness of target-hooked tokenization, while consistent improvements across both BPE-based and per-residue-based causal PLMs demonstrate that the proposed framework generalizes across models with different pretraining tokenization schemes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.