Back

PhageLysData: an evidence-aware and AI-ready dataset of phage lytic enzymes and depolymerases

Medina-Ortiz, D.; Olivera-Nappa, A.; Lienqueo, M. E.; Opazo, R.; Romero, J.

2026-08-25 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.24.746620 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacteriophage lytic enzymes and depolymerases are relevant to phage biology, antimicrobial development, and protein engineering, but their sequence and annotation data remain dispersed across general databases, specialized resources, genome-centred collections, and prediction-oriented datasets. We present PhageLysData, an evidence-aware and AI-ready resource constructed through reproducible multisource integration, provenance tracking, and exact-sequence consolidation. The release integrates 807,366 source observations from seven primary resources into 759,105 unique exact-sequence entities, comprising an evidence-supported Core of 11,867 entities, a Prediction Extension of 745,092 prediction-only candidates, and 2,146 Context entities retained for provenance and reference. This architecture preserves broad sequence-space coverage while maintaining a clear distinction between non-predictive and prediction-derived support. Core entities are enriched with harmonized biological annotations, physicochemical properties, independent InterProScan-derived functional annotations, mapped PDB and AlphaFold DB structural assets, and reusable numerical representations. For 11,259 eligible Core sequences, PhageLysData provides embeddings from 11 protein language models together with one-hot encoding under a common representation contract. Release-facing examples demonstrate latent-space exploration, unsupervised clustering, supervised classification, and evidence-aware candidate retrieval without defining a universal predictive benchmark. PhageLysData provides a traceable, versioned, and computationally accessible foundation for protein retrieval, comparative analysis, task-specific dataset construction, and machine-learning applications involving phage lytic enzymes and depolymerases.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.