Neuronal quantification in the primary motor cortex of mouse brains fixed with solutions from human gross anatomy laboratories
Gerin-Lajoie, A.; Frigon, E.-M.; Adame-Gonzalez, W.; Dadar, M.; Boire, D.; Maranzano, J.
Show abstract
Background: Brain banks usually provide small tissue blocks fixed by immersion in neutral-buffered formalin (NBF). While still underexploited for research, gross anatomy laboratories could provide full brains fixed by perfusion with solutions better suited for gross anatomy dissection. However, the chemicals in these solutions might have a different impact on histology protocols for cell quantification than in NBF-fixed brains. The main goal of this study is to compare the effects on the number and size of labeled neurons of the primary motor cortex (PMC) of mouse brains fixed with three different solutions: (1) NBF, typical of brain banks, (2) a saturated salt solution (SSS), and (3) an alcohol-formaldehyde solution (AFS), both used in human anatomy laboratories. Methods: 27 C57BL/6J mouse brains were perfused with the NBF (N=9), SSS (N=9) or AFS (N=9), then cut in 40-m slices and processed with immunohistochemistry to target neurons. Various quantitative variables were assessed manually and automatically on photomicrographs of 3 regions of interest (ROIs) of the PMC per specimen, namely the total and individual neuronal profile areas, number and diameters. The effects of the three fixatives on these variables were compared using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis, depending on the distribution. For measures on individual cells, a generalized linear mixed model was applied. Dice coefficients and correlations were applied to evaluate the agreement of the manual and automatic methods. Results: There was no significant difference between the brains fixed by the three fixatives for the total and individual cell areas, the total cell count and the cell diameters. The values obtained from manual and automatic measures had an overall good agreement (Dice coefficients > 0.79). Conclusion: It was found that the SSS and AFS had similar impacts on the quantitative variables in the tissue as the NBF. These results are promising for neuroscientists interested in using brains from anatomy laboratories for quantitative research on neurons from the PMC.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Upregulation of interleukin-1β and interleukin-18 in traumatic brain injury patients and their potential as biomarkers 93%
- AutoNeuriteJ: An ImageJ plugin for measurement and classification of neuritic extensions 92%
- Semi-automated protocol to quantify and characterize fluorescent three-dimensional vascular images 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying the area fraction fractionator (AFF) probe for total volume estimations of somatic, dendritic and axonal domains of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system in a murine model 95%
- The reliability of the isotropic fractionator method for counting total cells and neurons 93%
- Comparison of place field detection methods and their effect on place field stability and drift in mouse dCA1. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The first observation of osmotically neutral sodium accumulation in the myocardial interstitium 92%
- Enhanced expression of Dystrophin, IGF-1, CD44 and MYH3 in plasma and skeletal muscles including Diaphragm of mdx mice after oral administration of Neu REFIX Beta 1,3-1,6 glucan 91%
- Novel Adult Cortical Neuron Processing and Screening method illustrates Sex- and Age-dependent effects of pharmaceutical compounds 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of histological procedures and antigenicity of human post-mortem brains fixed with solutions used in gross anatomy laboratories 95%
- Development And Characterization Of A Non-Human Primate Model Of Disseminated Synucleinopathy 89%
- Age-related alterations in functional and structural networks in the brain in macaque monkeys 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.