Back

Translating SUVR bias correction to amyloid PET enables early imaging and more accurate simplified quantification

Honhar, P.; Properzi, M. J.; Schultz, A. P.; Johnson, K. A.; Price, J. C.

2026-08-28 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.08.24.26361268 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: A new method that corrects for time-dependent bias in standardized-uptake value ratios (SUVRs) was adapted and optimized for [11C]PiB (PiB) amyloid-beta (A{beta}) PET, across low-to-high A{beta} loads, relying only on PET data collected during the SUVR time-window. This modeling approach was evaluated in cross-sectional and longitudinal cohorts for earlier and shorter SUVR time-windows (30-45 min, 45-60 min) than commonly applied, to enable higher throughput imaging. Methods: The SUVR correction (SUVRc) approach was optimized and tested on separate cross-sectional (n=88), and longitudinal (36 participants, two time-points, 72 images) cohorts from the Harvard Aging Brain Study. The cross-sectional cohort spanned low, intermediate and high levels of cortical A{beta} pathology and the longitudinal images included two cohorts with low (5-10%) and high levels (~40%) of A{beta} change. SUVR and SUVRc were compared against SRTM DVR (0-60 min) to quantify A{beta} burden through Pearson's and Lin's correlations, difference plots and longitudinal change. Results: The mean regional bias in PiB SUVR (5-15%, depending on time-window and A{beta} burden) was significantly reduced to < 3% by SUVRc (corrected p < 0.05) in the cross-sectional cohorts for all time-windows, along with reductions in bias variability. SUVRc also showed higher Pearson's correlation (r) and Lin's concordance (LCC) with DVR across time-windows (r=0.98, LCC=0.99 at 30-45 min and 45-60 min) compared to uncorrected SUVR (r=0.96, LCC=0.95 at 30-45 min, r=0.97, LCC=0.92 at 45-60 min). Bland-Altman plots confirmed better agreement between SUVRc and DVR (mean bias at 30-45 min: 0.02 for SUVRc, 0.10 for SUVR; mean bias at 45-60 min: 0.01 for SUVRc, 0.17 for SUVR). Longitudinal DVR changes were more accurately represented by SUVRc, compared to uncorrected SUVR. Conclusions: SUVRc for [11C]PiB PET enables more accurate quantification of A{beta} burden than SUVR in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (relative to SRTM DVR), while enabling imaging at earlier and shorter time-windows. The improved accuracy would be beneficial in better quantifying amyloid re-emergence post anti-amyloid therapy and could be used for kinetic harmonization across time-windows and radiotracers.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.