Back

Exercise Capacity and Mental Health in Adults With a Systemic Right Ventricle

Mosher, B. P.; Woo, J. P.; Christle, J. W.; Tso, J. V.; Ashley, E. A.; Clark, D. E.

2026-08-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.08.24.26361239 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Adults with a systemic right ventricle (sRV) due to congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) or atrial switch repair for d-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA) experience substantial physiologic and psychosocial morbidity. Relationships among exercise capacity, sRV function, and mental health remain incompletely characterized. Objectives To characterize relationships among anatomic subtype, exercise capacity, sRV function, and mental health in adults with sRV physiology. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with ccTGA or d-TGA (Mustard/Senning) followed at a tertiary Adult Congenital Heart Disease program from 2000 to 2025. Clinical, imaging, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and patient-reported data were obtained from electronic health records. Mental health diagnoses were identified from clinical documentation. Functional status was assessed using NYHA class and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). Results Among 137 adults (ccTGA, n = 51; d-TGA, n = 86), percent-predicted peak VO2 was lower in d-TGA than ccTGA (60% vs 74%, p < 0.001), as was sRV systolic function (41 +/- 11% vs 47 +/- 10%, p < 0.01). Anxiety or depression was more common in d-TGA (46% vs 25%, p < 0.05). Across the cohort, anxiety or depression was associated with lower exercise capacity, worse NYHA functional class, and lower KCCQ scores. Conclusions Adults with d-TGA following atrial switch have lower exercise capacity, reduced sRV systolic function, and greater mental health burden than adults with ccTGA. These findings support integrated assessment of physiologic performance, functional status, and mental health in adults with sRV physiology.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.