Back

Health, behavioural, and social correlates of depressive symptoms among Brazilian adults: a preregistered exposure-wide association study with discovery and replication in two independent nationally representative cross-sectional surveys

Santos, B. d. S.; Passos, I. C.

2026-08-27 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.08.24.26361203 medRxiv
Show abstract

Depressive disorders are one of the most common psychiatric conditions worldwide. We systematically screened a prespecified exposure panel for associations with depressive symptoms and evaluated cross-wave replication among Brazilian adults. This preregistered exposure-wide association study used independent, nationally representative cross-sectional samples from the 2013 (n=60,202) and 2019 (n=88,531) Brazilian National Health Surveys. 31 general exposures were assessed with survey-weighted regression; four occupational exposures were analysed separately. The primary outcome was a positive Patient Health Questionnaire-9 screen (PHQ-9 >=10); continuous PHQ-9 score was secondary. Discoveries required a Benjamini-Yekutieli-adjusted p<0.05 in 2013; replication required the same coefficient direction and raw p<0.05 in 2019. 21 general exposures were primary discoveries, and all replicated. Associations spanned health status/health care (n=11), behaviour/participation (n=5), and social/material context (n=5). Poor or very poor vs very good self-rated health showed the largest association (adjusted prevalence ratio 10.97, 95% CI 8.79-13.69 in 2013; 12.33, 10.19-14.92 in 2019). Replicated correlates also included morbidity, smoking, prolonged television viewing, diet, group activities, education, income, sanitation, and nearby public space. All 25 continuous-outcome discoveries replicated. All four occupational associations retained the same direction and raw p<0.05 in 2019. This recurrent profile provides a reproducible map for prioritizing longitudinal research but, because both waves were cross-sectional and exposures were modelled separately, does not establish temporality, causality, or independent effects.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.