Expanding reproductive genetic screening through the inclusion of perinatal treatability
Tan, T. Y.; Haas, S.; Gao, X.; Li, J.; Araji, S.; Liu, A.; Wimberly, C.; Gold, N.; Rentas, S.; Duyzend, M.; Walsh, K. M.; Cohen, J. L.
Show abstract
Various professional organizations recommend screening prospective parents for autosomal recessive (AR) and X-linked (XL) conditions, which is reflected in commercial screening panels. There is merit to developing a distinct reproductive gene-list and analytic framework inclusive of genes based on available perinatal intervention, defined as possible prenatal intervention (including investigational) for the fetus or necessary early initiation of approved postnatal treatments. We evaluated a reproductive genetic screening framework that incorporates perinatal actionability across AR, XL, and selected autosomal dominant (AD) genes. Using a curated list of genetic conditions with perinatal intervention, we evaluated five subset gene lists to determine the individual-level number-needed-to-screen (NNS) to identify one individual with at least one qualifying heterozygous variant, defined as a heterozygous pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in a gene on the specified list. To conduct NNS analyses, we sourced carrier frequency and allele frequency data for each gene and their respective ClinVar-curated high-confidence (>=2 star) P/LP variants, from two population databases -- gnomAD v4.1 and All of Us (AoU) v8. The analyses produced an individual-level NNS of 3.20 (CI: 3.193, 3.212) using gnomAD and 3.62 (CI: 3.606, 3.640) using AoU. These estimates do not represent couple-level reproductive risk, affected-pregnancy yield, clinical diagnostic yield, or validation of a clinical screening test. These findings support further evaluation of a perinatal-actionability framework, with clinical value dependent on which genes drive yield, and whether the relevant gene, variant, mechanism, and phenotype combinations are actionable in a reproductive or perinatal context for both the pregnant woman and her future offspring.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Human Intolerome: a curated database to prioritize genomic variants in stillbirth, pregnancy loss, and neonatal death 94%
- Comprehensive phenotyping of 3q29 deletion syndrome: recommendations for clinical care 93%
- Whole-exome sequencing analysis on products of conception: A cohort study to evaluate clinical utility and genetic etiology for pregnancy loss 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inherited infertility - mapping loci associated with impaired female reproduction 91%
- Returning Actionable Genomic Results in a Research Biobank: Analytic Validity, Clinical Implementation and Resource Utilization 91%
- Extracting and calibrating evidence of variant pathogenicity from population biobank data 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole Genome Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Rare Disorders 90%
- IMPROVE-DD: Integrating Multiple Phenotype Resources Optimises Variant Evaluation in genetically determined Developmental Disorders 90%
- Identification and validation of novel candidate risk genes in endocytic vesicular trafficking associated with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistulas 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 90%
- Polycomb-associated and Trithorax-associated developmental conditions – phenotypic convergence and heterogeneity 90%
- Re-evaluation and Re-analysis of 152 research exomes five years after the initial report reveals clinically relevant changes in 20% 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- How do clinician and parent reported data differ? An analysis of similarity and difference in the datasets from a cross-syndrome genetics cohort study(GenROC) 92%
- A comparative medical genomics approach may facilitate the interpretation of rare missense variation 90%
- A Comprehensive Epithelial Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Genetic and Epidemiological Risk Factors 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.