Back

Social functioning in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD): a study of lived experience, relationships and support of patients and caregivers

Fernandez-Rodriguez, A.; Karavasiloglou, N.; Gkatzou, V.; Dexter, K.; Manion, M.; Silberschmidt, H.; Zambrano, S. C.; Pagnini, F.; Kuehni, C. E.; Goutaki, M.

2026-08-27 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.08.24.26360722 medRxiv
Show abstract

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare, genetic, multiorgan disease requiring lifelong management. Although PCD affects everyday life, little is known about how people with PCD experience social functioning (SF). We conducted a study within the international participatory Living with PCD study to comprehensively explore SF. First, we conducted a focus group and two semi-structured interviews with adults and parents of people with PCD. We analysed qualitative data thematically and used the findings to develop a multilingual online questionnaire on SF. The questionnaire was completed by 277 participants: 225 adults and adolescents with PCD (81%) and 52 parents of children with PCD (19%). Participants reported active social lives and strong close relationships. PCD had a positive impact on family relationships for 39% of adult/adolescent participants and 41% of parents reporting for children. Among adult/adolescent participants, 49% reported positive or no impact on romantic/intimate relationships, while 17% had avoided or ended a relationship because of PCD. PCD affected the ability to meet responsibilities for 54% of participants, free time for 58%, and planning effort for 53%. Participants were more comfortable discussing PCD with family, friends, and partners than in work or educational settings, where only 29% reported receiving support. Financial support, flexible work, or educational policies and better-trained healthcare professionals were the most frequently identified unmet needs. This study suggests that maintaining SF with PCD requires substantial individual and relational work. Improving SF for people with PCD requires systemic responses in healthcare, education, and employment, alongside support from close networks.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.