Translational asymmetry in neuromodulation for substance use disorders: a multi-database bibliometric analysis of primary studies (2000-2025)
Pereira, S. I. S.; Ferreira, M. H. L.; Camara, L. C.; Aguiar, D. R.; Souza, R. F.; Falcone, T.; Barnett, B. S.; Anand, A.
Show abstract
Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) remain common worldwide and inadequately treated. Neuromodulation targets neural circuits involved in reward, craving, and cognitive control. However, the primary research literature has not been systematically mapped regarding the relative contributions of clinical and preclinical studies. Methods: We conducted a multi-database bibliometric analysis of primary studies on neuromodulation for SUD. Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed were searched covering 2000-2025. After scope classification and exclusion of secondary literature, 810 primary research documents remained. Performance analysis and science mapping were performed with bibliometrix and VOSviewer. Results: Scientific output grew at a compound annual growth rate of 14.16% (2001-2025), accelerating after 2015. Of 810 studies, 82.8% were clinical, 12.5% preclinical, and 4.7% mixed/translational. Alcohol (31.5%) and nicotine/tobacco (25.7%) dominated the literature and were overwhelmingly clinical (>92%), whereas cocaine and opioids retained larger preclinical shares (24-27%). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was the leading modality (31.6%), followed by deep brain stimulation (24.9%) and transcranial direct current stimulation (24.2%). Keyword co-occurrence revealed three clusters: a clinical neuromodulation core, a nicotine/tobacco axis, and a preclinical reward-circuitry module. The United States and China led in output. Conclusions: Neuromodulation research for SUD is expanding rapidly and is heavily skewed toward clinical investigations. A persistent clinical-preclinical asymmetry and limited explicitly translational work constitute structural features of the field. Greater integration between mechanistic and clinical research is needed to advance definitive trials.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Epigenome-wide Association Study of Psilocybin-Induced Methylome Changes in Alcohol Use Disorder 92%
- Paving the way for precision treatment of psychiatric symptoms with functional connectivity neurofeedback 91%
- Targeting the prefrontal-supplementary motor network in obsessive-compulsive disorder with intensified electrical stimulation in two dosages: A randomized, controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Frontal tDCS reduces alcohol relapse rates by increasing connections from left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to addiction networks 95%
- Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell does not decrease cocaine self-administration in cocaine-dependent rats but increases GluR1/GluA1 in the central nucleus of the amygdala 94%
- Intensified stimulation targeting lateral and medial prefrontal cortices for the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-comparison study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cue-Induced Craving and Negative Emotion Disrupt Response Inhibition in Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Behavioral and fMRI Results from a Mixed Go/No-Go Task 92%
- LIBR Methamphetamine and Opioid Cue Database (LIBR MOCD): Development and Validation 92%
- Brain Network Segregation is Associated with Drug Use Severity in Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-trial prediction of treatment response to transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with major depressive disorder 92%
- Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging in cocaine use disorder 90%
- Specific and converging modulation of the CRH and noradrenergic systems across drug classes and natural rewards in an incubation of seeking paradigm 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.