Back

Comparing Developmental Outcomes of Autistic Preschoolers Across Special and Mainstream Educational Settings

Bachrach, M. N.; Ilan, M.; Faroy, M.; Michaelovsky, A.; Zagdon, D.; Sadaka, Y.; Bar Yosef, O.; Aran, A.; Begin, M.; Zachor, D.; Avni, E.; Koller, J.; Menashe, I.; Kolodny, T.; Dinstein, I.; Meiri, G.

2026-08-25 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.08.23.26361140 medRxiv
Show abstract

In many high-income countries, autistic children attend preschools ranging from exclusive special education (SE) to inclusive mainstream education (ME). These settings differ in staff expertise, capacity to implement structured autism interventions, exposure to typically developing peers, and cost. In this prospective longitudinal study, we compared 119 autistic children across three preschool settings in southern Israel: SE with TABAM services, an extended intervention program; SE without TABAM; and ME. Children completed behavioral assessments at the beginning and end of their first preschool year, yielding measures of cognition, autism symptom severity, joint attention, verbal abilities, adaptive behaviors, and aberrant behaviors. Developmental trajectories varied across children, with some demonstrating marked gains and others showing limited progress. On average, developmental changes were modest across most domains and were not explained by educational setting. The only exception was verbal ability, where children in SE with TABAM showed greater gains than children in SE without TABAM. These findings suggest that autistic children in ME and SE demonstrated broadly similar developmental trajectories during their first preschool year. Further large-scale research is needed to identify which children may benefit more from specific educational environments and intervention approaches, and to inform ongoing efforts to optimize preschool services for autistic children.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.