Back

CHIASM: A Self-Supervised Visual Field Encoder for Neuro-Ophthalmology

Parker, T. M.; Oermann, E. K.; Grossman, S. N.; Kenney, R. C.

2026-08-25 neurology
10.64898/2026.08.23.26361135 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems for glaucoma diagnosis and prognostication from visual fields (VF) are under active development, yet do not audit for vertical-meridian-respecting field loss - known sequelae of stroke, hemorrhage, and neoplasm. We developed a self-supervised encoder of automated perimetry that learns anatomically interpretable VF structure without labels, and evaluated its capacity to identify suspected neurologic VF patterns in an independent public glaucoma dataset. Methods: We pretrained a 128-dimensional masked autoencoder on 23,223 unlabeled Humphrey VFs (patient-grouped training split of 28,943 fields from 3,871 patients; UWHVF, all-comers perimetry), using monocular pattern-deviation input. A supervised linear classifier over vertical-midline latent dimensions was trained on per-eye expert neurological/non-neurological labels and assessed under hard-negative cross-validation, with specificity evaluated on 100 held-out, structurally separated UWHVF controls. External evaluation used the Harvard-Glaucoma Fairness dataset (Harvard-GF; 3,300 patients with paired VF and optical coherence tomography [OCT] from a single academic center), which contributed no data at any training stage. Results: Masked reconstruction recovered structure concordant with retinal neuroanatomy: 50 of 128 latent dimensions emerged spatially specialized, versus 23 for the total-deviation encoder. The classifier achieved cross-validated balanced accuracy 0.78 (95% CI, 0.75-0.82) and AUC 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82-0.89), with no false positives among the 100 held-out controls. Applied to Harvard-GF without fine-tuning, it identified a top-20 of 1,748 glaucoma-labeled patients (1.1%) with morphology inconsistent with glaucoma; all 20 were positive on the rule-based Neurological Hemifield Test (mean score 62.4), and OCT showed preserved superior (Cohen d = +0.68; P < .001) and inferior (d = +0.63; P = .003) retinal nerve fiber layer versus severity-matched controls. Conclusions: A self-supervised VF encoder learned anatomically interpretable visual field structure from unlabeled data and identified suspected neurological cases in a curated glaucoma dataset, with expert, rule-based, and OCT corroboration. Visual field datasets used to train glaucoma AI may benefit from neurological screening before model training; the encoder reported here supports such audits and provides a foundation for neuro-ophthalmic AI beyond fundus photography and OCT.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.