MAESTRO: A Public, Generalizable Model for Stroke Lesion Segmentation from T1 MRI Across the Recovery Continuum
Khan, M. H.; Marin-Pardo, O.; Chakraborty, S.; Lee, K.; Lee, S. Y.; Raman, N.; Iglesias, J. E.; Liew, S.-L.
Show abstract
Accurate stroke lesion segmentation is essential for large-scale neuroimaging studies, yet manual delineation remains labor-intensive, and existing automated methods often struggle to generalize across imaging protocols and stages of recovery. We developed MAESTRO, a deep learning framework for automated lesion segmentation across the stroke recovery continuum using T1-weighted (T1) MRI alone. We hypothesized that combining a transformer-based architecture with an image augmentation strategy would improve segmentation accuracy and robustness under heterogeneous imaging conditions. T1 MRI scans and expert-traced lesion masks from 955 stroke participants across 33 international cohorts were used to train and evaluate MAESTRO within the open-source nnU-Net framework. Performance was evaluated on a held-out test set using spatial and volumetric agreement metrics. An exploratory human-in-the-loop (HITL) evaluation compared correction of MAESTRO-generated segmentations with manual tracing from scratch. MAESTRO achieved the strongest performance across several evaluated model configurations, providing the most accurate lesion localization and lesion volume estimates (median Dice = 0.686; Pearson r = 0.861; ICC = 0.792). Segmentation performance was sensitive to lesion size and stroke chronicity but remained robust across diverse imaging conditions. Additionally, using a HITL workflow to correct MAESTRO segmentations reduced annotation time by 47.4% compared to manual tracing while improving accuracy relative to both automated and manual workflows. MAESTRO is publicly available to enable robust, automated stroke lesion segmentation from T1 MRI. When combined with human review and correction, MAESTRO offers a practical approach for generating standardized, high-quality lesion annotations, helping reduce a major practical barrier to large-scale stroke imaging studies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- LesionQuant for assessment of MRI in multiple sclerosis - a promising supplement to the visual scan inspection 92%
- Improved Injury Detection Through Harmonizing Multi-Site Neuroimaging Data after Experimental TBI: A Translational Outcomes Project in NeuroTrauma (TOP-NT) Consortium Study 92%
- End to end stroke triage using cerebrovascular morphology and machine learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lesion aware automated processing pipeline for multimodal neuroimaging stroke data and The Virtual Brain (TVB) 96%
- Deep Bayesian networks for uncertainty estimation and adversarial resistance of white matter hyperintensity segmentation 95%
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fluid and White Matter Suppression Contrasts MRI Improves Deep Learning Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Cortical Lesions 95%
- QSMRim-Net: Imbalance-Aware Learning for Identification of Chronic Active Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on Quantitative Susceptibility Maps 95%
- LST-AI: a Deep Learning Ensemble for Accurate MS Lesion Segmentation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A large, curated, open-source stroke neuroimaging dataset to improve lesion segmentation algorithms 97%
- Magnetic resonance imaging datasets with anatomical fiducials for quality control and registration 95%
- TractoInferno: A large-scale, open-source, multi-site database for machine learning dMRI tractography 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- BrainQCNet: a Deep Learning attention-based model for the automated detection of artifacts in brain structural MRI scans. 94%
- FONDUE: Robust resolution-invariant denoising of MR Images using Nested UNets 94%
- ReMiND: Recovery of Missing Neuroimaging using Diffusion Models with Application to Alzheimer’s Disease 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.