Back

Programmable bioprinting of tumor microenvironment arrays reveals laminin-dependent drug sensitivity

Moulin, M.; Sehic, E.; Engberg, A.; Stelzl, C.; Holmberg, F.; Bohn Pessatti, T.; Schmuck, B.; Rising, A.; Kreuger, J.; O'Callaghan, P.

2026-08-21 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.08.21.745937 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present an active mixing toolhead for extrusion bioprinting. The tool enables the programmable fabrication of tumor microenvironment gradient arrays, through controlled deposition of mixed hydrogel precursor formulations into 384-well plates, pre-seeded with tumor cells. It operates on an open-source bioprinter and can actively mix arbitrary ratios of two hydrogel precursors prior to extrusion. These concentration gradient arrays are compatible with quantitative image analysis of cell viability and morphological responses to hydrogels conditioned with drug or extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. The tools capacity to mix and print hydrogel precursor gradients was demonstrated using alginate and highly concentrated mCherry-conjugated mini-spidroin solutions. Hydrogel precursor stocks contained fluorescent reporters to facilitate quantifications of mixing efficiency, and as proxies for drug and ECM protein concentrations. The tool was applied to generate hydrogel-based gradients of the apoptosis-inducer staurosporine, from which concentration-dependent MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell death responses were quantified. Gradient arrays of the ECM protein laminin-511, implicated in breast cancer tumorigenesis, were generated and revealed that increasing laminin-511 concentrations potentiated staurosporine-induced cell death. The study demonstrates the utility of this active mixing toolhead for producing hydrogel gradient arrays, and demonstrates the relevance of studying drug-responses in tumor microenvironment models that account for disease-specific ECM components.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.