Multimodal artificial intelligence for personalized hepatocellular carcinoma treatment strategy selection
Feng, W.; Liu, S.; Yang, Z.; Tao, Y.; Gu, X.; Jin, W.
Show abstract
Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment selection demands nuanced integration of heterogeneous patient data, yet prevailing predictive models rely on restricted data modalities and oversimplified therapeutic frameworks, compromising clinical translation. Objective We developed and validated a multimodal artificial intelligence framework to guide optimal treatment strategy selection across the full spectrum of HCC interventions. Methods This retrospective study comprised 1,043 HCC patients (development cohort, January 2017-December 2023) and 55 external validation patients (2023) from Wuxi Peoples Hospital. We engineered Embedding-Augmented Extra Trees (ET-Emb), a novel model fusing structured clinical variables with contextual text embeddings derived from medical histories and radiology reports. ET-Emb quantifies probabilities for five primary treatments: open/laparoscopic resection, transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and chemotherapy. Model performance was rigorously assessed via 10-fold cross-validation and external validation using ROC-AUC and PR-AUC metrics. Results ET-Emb demonstrated robust performance in the development cohort (ROC-AUC: 0.84 {+/-} 0.04; PR-AUC: 0.55 {+/-} 0.06), significantly outperforming established benchmarks. This generalizability was preserved in external validation (ROC-AUC: 0.77 {+/-} 0.02; PR-AUC: 0.47 {+/-} 0.03). SHAP analysis identified textual clinical narratives and socioeconomic determinants as critical predictive drivers. Conclusions By unifying structured and unstructured data modalities, ET-Emb delivers accurate, multi-treatment strategy prediction for HCC. Its clinical validity and the demonstrated significance of textual features establish multimodal AI as an essential paradigm for simulating complex oncological decision-making, positioning ET-Emb as a transformative tool for precision HCC management.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 92%
- An Interpretable Risk Prediction Model for Healthcare with Pattern Attention 92%
- An Ontology-based Approach to Guide and Document Variable and Data Source Selection and Data Integration Process to Support Integrative Data Analysis in Cancer Outcomes Research 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 93%
- CT-based Rapid Triage of COVID-19 Patients: Risk Prediction and Progression Estimation of ICU Admission, Mechanical Ventilation, and Death of Hospitalized Patients 92%
- Enhancing Privacy-Preserving Deployable Large Language Models for Perioperative Complication Detection: A Targeted Strategy with LoRA Fine-tuning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- MultiSurv: Long-term cancer survival prediction using multimodal deep learning 93%
- A deep learning approach for Pan-Renal Cell Carcinoma classification and survival prediction from histopathology images 92%
- Early risk assessment for COVID-19 patients from emergency department data using machine learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extraction of Crohn's Disease Clinical Phenotypes from Clinical Text Using Natural Language Processing 91%
- Machine learning models predict long COVID outcomes based on baseline clinical and immunologic factors 90%
- Subpopulation-specific Machine Learning Prognosis for Underrepresented Patients with Double Prioritized Bias Correction 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Linking Patient Records at Scale with a Hybrid Approach Combining Contrastive Learning and Deterministic Rules 90%
- Deep Learning Enhances Detection of Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer from mpMRI of 1001 Patients 90%
- Multilevel predictors categorization for post-CABG atrial fibrillation prediction 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.