Back

Acquisition of Group B streptococcus colonization in preterm pregnancy

Bowers, A.; Elliott, J.; Book, N.; Krishna, S.; Hamburg-Shields, E.

2026-08-26 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.08.21.26361025 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to estimate the negative predictive value (NPV) of screening for group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant patients undergoing antepartum hospitalization for GBS colonization status at the time of preterm delivery. Study Design: This prospective, observational cohort study compared GBS colonization status upon initial hospital admission to that at the time of delivery. Pregnant patients at 22 to 35 weeks gestation admitted to the antepartum unit at a tertiary care hospital underwent standard screening for GBS colonization. When preterm labor progressed or iatrogenic preterm delivery was indicated, the GBS colonization test was repeated. Comparison of the sequential test results was performed to determine the NPV of the antepartum screening test for the intrapartum status. Results: 159 eligible patients were enrolled in the study, and 100 completed the study and were included in the analysis. The average gestational age at admission was 30 weeks 1 day (95% confidence interval [CI] 29w4d to 30w6d) and the average duration of pregnancy latency in the study group was 17.5 days (95% CI 15.1 to 19.8). GBS colonization rate at the time of admission was 18% and at the time of delivery was 20%. The NPV of GBS screening at admission was 91.5% (95% CI 83.2 to 96.5%) and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 72.2% (95% CI 46.4 to 90.3%). Conclusion: In a cohort of pregnant patients with preterm pregnancy complications, GBS screening at the time of antepartum hospital admission has an NPV of 91.5% (95% CI 83.2 to 96.5%) for GBS colonization at the time of preterm delivery. This is comparable to the published NPV of routine GBS screening for colonization status at term delivery.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.