A multimodal protocol for assessing real-world monitoring of lower-limb prosthesis use
Ahmed, M.; Otalora, S.; Das Gupta, S.; Kutsuzawa, G.; Akaydin, A.; Le Kernec, J.; Kobayashi, Y.; Mico-Amigo, E.
Show abstract
Prosthesis non-use and abandonment remain common among people with lower-limb amputation, yet current outcome measures capture only limited aspects of how prostheses are used in everyday life. Clinical assessments are typically conducted in controlled settings and rely on self-report or aggregate activity counts, which do not adequately represent functional performance, physiological effort, or lived experience during real-world prosthesis use. Wearable and ambient sensing offer a means of addressing this gap, but existing approaches tend to measure single dimensions in isolation and are rarely validated against laboratory reference standards before free-living deployment. This protocol describes an integrated multimodal framework for assessing real-world lower-limb prosthesis use across three complementary domains: classification of activities of daily living, estimation of energy expenditure, and assessment of emotional state. Approximately 40 adults with unilateral transfemoral or transtibial amputation complete a two-phase protocol. In the laboratory phase, wearable inertial, physiological, and ambient sensing are validated against established reference standards, including video annotation and indirect calorimetry. In the free-living phase, validated models are applied during a single seven-day home monitoring period, unifying all three domains within one deployment. A defined data harmonisation and quality-control procedure aligns heterogeneous sensor streams and preserves traceability between laboratory calibration and free-living measurement, enabling reproducible interpretation of functional behaviour, metabolic cost, and momentary emotional experience in relation to established clinical outcome domains. By integrating multimodal sensing at the level of study design rather than post-hoc analysis, the framework provides a validated, reproducible methodology for characterising prosthesis use beyond the capacity of conventional instruments, offering a transferable approach for real-world monitoring in rehabilitation research
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Design and Evaluation of a Bone-anchored, Neurally-controlled Knee Prosthesis 94%
- Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis 94%
- Technology-aided assessment of functionally relevant sensorimotor impairments in arm and hand of post-stroke individuals 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Low-Cost Markerless motion capture system to automate Functional Gait Assessment: Feasibility Study 95%
- Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial on the Safety, Feasibility, and Usability of the ABLE Exoskeleton: A Comparative Study with Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthoses 94%
- Validity and reliability of an app-based medical device to empower individuals in evaluating their physical capacities 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Wearable Platform for Real-Time Control of a Prosthetic Hand by High-Density EMG 92%
- Limited diagnostic accuracy of smartphone-based digital biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease in a remotely-administered setting 91%
- Reliable data collection in participatory trials to assess digital healthcare apps. 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep 93%
- Playing the piano with a robotic third thumb: Assessing constraints of human augmentation 93%
- Ambulatory physiological measures obtained under naturalistic urban mobility conditions have acceptable reliability 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.