Back

WISE-Screen: A Smartphone-Based Analytical Framework for Automated ASD Screening and Phenotyping via High-Fidelity Eye-tracking

Ho, L. Y.-L.; Wong, K. C.-Y.; Cheng, L. W.-K.; Wan, A. T.-Y.; She, C. H.; Tsang, K. L. V.; So, H.-C.; Tsui, S. K.-W.

2026-08-24 health informatics
10.64898/2026.08.21.26358650 medRxiv
Show abstract

The rising prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) strains clinical infrastructure. Gold-standard tools like ADOS-2 face high costs, specialized training requirements, and extensive waitlists, delaying diagnosis and intervention. While eye-tracking offers a promising digital biomarker, existing tools lack scalable community deployment due to hardware costs and operational constraints. Here, we introduce the WISE-Screen framework, a smartphone-based real-time architecture for autonomous ASD Screening and multidimensional phenotypic profiling, evaluating its conceptual feasibility across a development-tally diverse age range. Two machine learning pipelines processed smartphone-captured eye-gaze data: (1) a Scanpath-based (SP) pipeline utilizing saliency maps and engineered scanpath features across 34 stimuli to estimate ASD-typical gaze probabilities, and (2) a Domain-task-based (DT) pipeline evaluating responses to 17 specialized tasks across four phenotypic domains (social, emotional, sensory, executive). Models were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation on 35 participants (16 ASD, 19 Non-ASD, ages 2.5-17) with ADOS-2 confirmed status. Compared to a baseline demographic model (ROC-AUC = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68-0.96), performance improved using SP model (ROC-AUC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.78-1.00) and DT model (ROC-AUC = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.75-1.00), with the integrated model reaching a peak ROC-AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.80-1.00). Age- and sex-residualized models maintained an adjusted ROC-AUC of 0.74 (95% CI:0.57-0.92), with sensory, social and emotional domains showing the strongest association. WISE-Screen offers a scalable, automated adjunct to traditional protocols, providing accessible digital phenotyping to overcome systemic ASD screening barriers, though further evaluation in larger cohorts is warranted.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.