Back

A chromosome-level assembly of an aquatic passerine bird, the northern white-throated dipper, Cinclus cinclus cinclus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Strand, M. A.; Toerresen, O. K.; Skage, M.; Ferrari, G.; Tooming-Klunderud, A.; Johnsen, A.; Jakobsen, K. S.

2026-08-24 genomics
10.64898/2026.08.20.746034 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present a chromosome-level genome assembly of a female Norwegian white-throated dipper (Cinclus cinclus cinclus) generated using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long reads and Hi-C scaffolding. The assembly comprises two pseudo-haplotypes, hap1 (1186 Mb) and hap2 (1115 Mb), with 96.7% and 94.4% of sequences assigned to chromosome-scale scaffolds, respectively. Both pseudo-haplotypes contain 40 autosomes, with the Z and W sex chromosomes assigned to hap1. Compared with the PacBio HiFi-based C. c. gularis reference assembly bCinCin1.1.pri, which contains 38 autosomes, sequence represented as a single dot-chromosome (chr 36) is resolved into three distinct dot-chromosomes (chr 36, 39, and 40), a configuration supported by Hi-C contact patterns. BUSCO completeness was high for hap1 (99.2%) and hap2 (95.0%), with 19,003 and 17,746 predicted protein-coding genes, respectively. Compared with the HiFi-based C. c. gularis reference and HiFi-based assemblies generated from the same individual, the ONT-derived assemblies were substantially less fragmented and recovered more sequence from the smallest chromosomes. Synteny was otherwise largely conserved between subspecies. HiFi depletion increased strongly from macrochromosomes to micro- and dot-chromosomes, and HiFi-depleted regions were enriched for repeats and predicted non-B-DNA-associated features, particularly G-quadruplexes and direct repeats, whereas ONT coverage remained comparatively stable. These results show that conventional genome-wide assembly metrics can obscure substantial differences in the recovery of repeat-rich avian dot-chromosomes and highlight the value of chromosome-aware evaluation and ONT sequencing for recovering these regions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.