Back

Effects of vapor inhalation of 6-methyl nicotine in female and male rats

Taffe, M. A.; Kim, H. S.; Doran, T. A.; Coons, T. R.; Rahman, S. R.; Grant, Y.; Vandewater, S. A.

2026-08-25 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.08.20.746016 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The nicotine analog 6-methyl nicotine (6-MN) has appeared in commercial e-cigarette liquids, and other products, spurring interest in determining the extent to which it conveys similar effects to those of nicotine. Objective: To determine if 6-MN acts like nicotine to decrease body temperature, decrease nociception, suppress wheel activity and reinforce operant behavior when delivered by vapor inhalation using an Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS; "e-cigarette") approach in a rat model. Methods: Male and female (N=8 per sex) young adult Sprague-Dawley rats were evaluated for rectal temperature and nociceptive responses (warm water tail-withdrawal) to the inhalation of vapor from (-)-6-MN or (-)-nicotine in concentrations ranging from 5-30 mg/mL in the propylene glycol vehicle. Rats were then assessed for the reinforcing effects of nicotine and 6-MN using a vapor self-administration procedure and the rate suppressing effects of nicotine and 6-MN on wheel activity following injection. Results: Inhalation of nicotine or 6-MN for 30 minutes decreased the rectal temperature and increased tail-withdrawal latency of female and male rats in a concentration-dependent manner. The magnitude of the effects of 6-MN and nicotine were similar at similar vapor concentrations. Operant responding for 6-MN vapor was increased by pre-treatment with the antagonist mecamylamine. 6-MN was more potent than nicotine at suppressing wheel activity after injection. Conclusions: 6-MN induces effects very similar to those of nicotine, at a similar potency when inhaled and at a slightly increased potency when injected.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.