Back

Nationwide multi-omics profiling of Japanese jack mackerel reveals geographic gut microbiome structuring despite host panmixia

Yoshida, M.-a.; Tsunoda, K.; Kasane, H.; Kishimoto, A.; Mori, S.; Komiya, K.; Hamada, M.; Sekiguchi, T.; Goto, Y.; Ishikawa, N.; Suyama, Y.; Setiamarga, D. H. E.

2026-08-20 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.20.745924 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Host genetic markers often fail to resolve regional origins in highly connected or panmictic marine species. The Japanese jack mackerel, Trachurus japonicus, is a commercially important fishery species around Japan that shows little or no detectable population structure. Here, we used nationwide multi-omics profiling to compare host genomic variation and gut microbiome composition in wild T. japonicus collected from coastal regions across Japan. We generated MIG-seq data for 43 individuals and 16S rRNA gene profiles for 24 individuals; after quality filtering, 19 individuals remained for matched host-microbiome comparison. Genome-wide host SNP analyses showed weak or absent geographic population structure, consistent with previous evidence of panmixia in Japanese waters. In contrast, gut microbiome composition showed geographic structuring based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and PERMANOVA, and this pattern was not explained by proximity to river mouths or host-related variables. Locality- or individual-associated bacterial lineages contributed to the observed differences in the microbiome, while chloroplast-associated and Cyanobacteria-assigned ASVs suggested recent dietary or environmental input. These results indicate that gut microbiome can show regional biological variation not apparent from host genetic markers alone. Our study provides a proof-of-concept example of integrating host genomics and gut microbiome profiling to evaluate regional characteristics and origins in highly connected marine animals.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.