Artificial Intelligence Model: Optimizing Cancer Risk Level Predictions Using Machine learning and deep learning approaches
Abd Aziz, A. B.; Arabiat, A.; Abu Owida, H.; Abuowaida, S.; Alshdaifa, N.; A. Mashagba, H.
Show abstract
This study emphasizes the potential of computational techniques in cancer risk assessment, lighting opportunities for specific and data-driven healthcare solutions. This study examines the use of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) approaches to improve cancer risk assessment using a Kaggle dataset. The study uses Java-based ML software to create and evaluate multiple predictive models, taking advantage of its powerful libraries and frameworks for processing and analyzing cancer risk indicators. This work analyzes model performance using 10-fold cross-validation, resulting in reliable generalization and accuracy estimates. Several classification techniques, such as Random Forest (RF) logistic regression (LR), decision trees (DT), Naive Bayes (NB), and Multi-layer perceptron (MLP), are used to assess their efficacy in predicting risk levels for various cancer types. To measure classification effectiveness, key performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score are produced, in addition to multi-class confusion matrices. The results show that the RF model is the best classifier for classification, with accuracy of 99.85%, F-measure of 99.80%, precision of 99.80%, and sensitivity of 99.90%. These findings demonstrate the model's ability to effectively estimate cancer risk levels among individuals. of cancer risk estimations, allowing for earlier discovery and more effective medical care.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ChatGPT-Enhanced ROC Analysis (CERA): A Shiny Web Tool for Finding Optimal Cutoff in Biomarker Analysis 95%
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 94%
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Probability from Imbalanced Medical Survey Data: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Explainable AI (XAI) Insights 96%
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 95%
- A machine-learning Approach for Stress Detection Using Wearable Sensors in Free-living Environments 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 95%
- A multipurpose machine learning approach to predict COVID-19 negative prognosis in Sao Paulo, Brazil 94%
- A deep learning approach for Pan-Renal Cell Carcinoma classification and survival prediction from histopathology images 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 96%
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 95%
- Combining symbolic regression with the Cox proportional hazards model improves prediction of heart failure deaths 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.