Does Data Preprocessing Affect Tree-Based Super Learners? An Investigation of Ensemble Optimization and Oracle Properties in Clinical Classification.
Darko, R.; Dwumah, D.; Agyapong, K. S.; Agyenim-Boateng, Y.; Darko Anim, R.; Wisdom Jakper, J.; Owusu-Ansah, N. K.; Owusu-Ansah, R.
Show abstract
Machine learning workflows frequently incorporate data preprocessing to enhance predictive performance. However, the need for Super Learner ensembles made up only of preprocessing-invariant tree-based algorithms remains unexplored. Using three benchmark clinical classification datasets, this study examined how preprocessing affected the Super Learner's prediction performance, learner weight distribution, and oracle behavior. The Heart Disease (207 observations), Indian Liver Patient Dataset (583 observations), and Pima Indians Diabetes (768 observations) datasets were used to create a Super Learner ensemble model that included Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Random Forest, Ranger, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Models were evaluated under raw and preprocessed data conditions using repeated cross-validation. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), and Brier score. Learner weight allocation and Oracle Gap were compared using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment. Preprocessing produced negligible changes in predictive performance for the Heart Disease and Pima datasets. For the ILPD dataset, preprocessing significantly improved AUC (0.746 to 0.752; adjusted p = 0.0017) and reduced the Brier score (0.177 to 0.175; adjusted p < 0.001). Learner weights remained largely stable, although Random Forest replaced Ranger as the dominant learner for the Heart Disease dataset. Oracle Gaps remained extremely small (<0.002) across all datasets and did not differ significantly between preprocessing conditions. Preprocessing provides limited benefit for Super Learner ensembles composed of preprocessing-invariant learners and does not materially alter their oracle behavior. Preprocessing decisions should therefore be guided by dataset characteristics rather than adopted as a universal modelling practice.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Ward Transfer Mortality with Machine Learning 91%
- Predicting the disease outcome in COVID-19 positive patients through Machine Learning: a retrospective cohort study with Brazilian data 91%
- Data-driven Discovery of Mathematical and Physical Relations in Oncology Data using Human-understandable Machine Learning 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 92%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 92%
- Optimized Feature Selection and Advanced Machine Learning for Stroke Risk Prediction in Revascularized Coronary Artery Disease Patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comparative Analysis in a Clinical Cohort: Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations and a Novel Super Learner-Based Imputation Approach 92%
- Towards reduction in bias in epidemic curves due to outcome misclassification through Bayesian analysis of time-series of laboratory test results: Case study of COVID-19 in Alberta, Canada and Philadelphia, USA 89%
- Prediction-powered Inference for Clinical Trials 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 93%
- Enhanced machine learning and hybrid ensemble approaches for coronary heart disease prediction 92%
- Optimising supervised machine learning algorithms predicting cigarette cravings and lapses for a smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning for classifying chronic kidney disease and predicting creatinine levels using at-home measurements 93%
- Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Between High Income and Low-Middle Income Countries for Enhanced Model Fairness and Generalizability 92%
- Selecting the most important self-assessed features for predicting conversion to Mild Cognitive Impairment with Random Forest and Permutation-based methods 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.