Back

WIO-ReefFish: A High-Resolution Dataset for Taxon-Aware Coral Reef Fish Detection in the Western Indian Ocean

Gerard, J.; Branger, L.; Huyghe, F.; Kochzius, M.; Otwoma, L.; Bergacker, S.; op't Roodt, L.; Rumisha, c.; Di Bella, L.

2026-08-20 ecology
10.64898/2026.08.19.745797 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coral reef fish assemblages are widely used as indicators of ecosystem condition, yet manual annotation of underwater video remains a major bottleneck for scalable biodiversity monitoring. Despite rapid progress in automated detection, ecologically realistic and publicly available datasets remain scarce, particularly for the Western Indian Ocean. Here, we present WIO-ReefFish, a reef fish detection dataset derived from diver-operated line-intercept transects and designed for ecological monitoring under natural survey conditions. WIO-ReefFish comprises 1,000 ultra-high-definition images (3840 $\times$ 2160 pixels) and 6,768 exhaustive bounding-box annotations spanning 24 taxonomic categories, thereby preserving full-frame assemblage structure in complex reef scenes. We also establish a standardized benchmark across nine object detection models under two complementary protocols: class-aware detection and class-agnostic fish localization. Detection performance was consistently higher under the class-agnostic protocol. The best-performing model (RT-DETR) improved from 0.48 mAP50 in the class-aware setting to 0.70 mAP50 when taxonomic constraints were removed, indicating that taxonomic discrimination remains substantially more challenging than fish localisation in reef imagery. Spatially independent evaluation revealed a pronounced generalisation gap, particularly for taxonomic detection, whereas class-agnostic fish localisation remained substantially more robust across transects and countries. Together, these results establish WIO-ReefFish as a realistic benchmark for automated reef fish detection and provide a foundation for more robust computer-vision tools in coral reef biodiversity monitoring. The WIO-ReefFish dataset and associated benchmarking resources are publicly available.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.