Back

Comparison of Culture Systems for Mouse Living Myocardial Slices in Cardiac Fibrosis Research

Kopse, N.; Bonazza, G. A.; Laimbacher, A.; Hofman, A.; Distler, O.; Blyszczuk, P.; Kania, G.

2026-08-20 cell biology
10.64898/2026.08.19.745687 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Living myocardial slices (LMS) are a highly relevant ex vivo model for investigating cardiac physiology and disease, as they preserve the native three-dimensional architecture, cellular diversity, and extracellular matrix of the heart. In addition, LMS enable longitudinal functional and molecular analyses. In this study, we established and compared two LMS culture approaches: an air-liquid interface system and a biomimetic culture system. We further examined how different slicing techniques affect tissue quality and longevity within the biomimetic setup. To develop a fibrosis model, LMS were stimulated with transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) and/or exposed to increased mechanical load. Tissue viability was assessed using LIVE/DEAD staining and the MTT assay, while cytotoxicity was evaluated with the LDH-Glo-TM Cytotoxicity assay. Contractile function was measured, and fibrotic remodelling was analysed using RT-qPCR, ELISA, and immunohistochemistry. Our results demonstrate that LMS cultured in the biomimetic system exhibit superior viability, structural integrity, and functional performance compared with those maintained at the air-liquid interface. Mouse LMS could be stably cultured for up to one week in the biomimetic system. Importantly, sample preparation, particularly the slicing method, had a significant impact on tissue quality and culture duration. While TGF-beta1 stimulation alone did not consistently induce fibrosis, combining TGF-beta1 treatment with increased mechanical load led to more pronounced fibrotic remodelling in LMS. These findings highlight the importance of biomechanical cues in modelling cardiac fibrosis ex vivo and support the biomimetic system as a robust platform for functional and disease-relevant studies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.