Psychometric Properties of the AASPIRE Autistic Burnout Measure - Revised (AABM-R)
Nicolaidis, C.; Yang, L.-Q.; Uretsky, M.; Raymaker, D. M.; Baker-Ericzen, M.; Grillo, V.; Kapp, S. K.; Kripke-Ludwig, R.; Maslak, J.; Moura, I.; Scharer, M.; Wallington, A. F.
Show abstract
Background: Autistic Chronic Energy Depletion Syndrome, commonly referred to as Autistic Burnout, is a debilitating condition characterized by exhaustion, loss of function, and reduced tolerance to stimuli. While several instruments attempt to measure it, validation studies have only used cross-sectional designs and/or convenience samples with low support needs, limiting understanding of their performance across heterogeneous, autistic populations and over time. Methods: Using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach, we revised the 27-item AASPIRE Autistic Burnout Measure (AABM) into a 14-item AASPIRE Autistic Burnout Measure-Revised (AABM-R) and tested it in a longitudinal study of 835 autistic adults recruited from healthcare systems, disability services, and the community. Participants completed surveys directly (with or without support) or via a caregiver. We assessed structural validity and measurement invariance using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, tested construct validity through a priori hypothesis testing, examined discriminant validity from depression using longitudinal factor analysis and cross-lagged panel models, and assessed criterion validity using ROC analysis. Results: The AABM-R demonstrated a clear single-factor structure among direct reporters, with and without support, and measurement invariance across these groups; findings were less conclusive for the smaller caregiver-report subsample. Autistic burnout correlated as hypothesized with stressors (e.g., discrimination, masking, adverse childhood experiences), supports (e.g., social support, receiving needed help with daily living activities), and broader outcomes (e.g., quality of life, depression, anxiety). Longitudinal modeling supported autistic burnout as empirically distinct from, though related to, depression. ROC analysis (AUC = 0.89) supported cut-offs distinguishing probable (33-56, LR 7.38), unsure, and unlikely (0-22, LR 0.15) burnout. Conclusions: The AABM-R is a brief, accessible, psychometrically sound measure of autistic burnout suitable for heterogeneous autistic populations, with preliminary clinical cut-offs to guide screening. Further research is needed on the caregiver-report version and on longitudinal predictors and outcomes of burnout.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Health-related quality of life in individuals with syndromic autism spectrum disorders 92%
- The Brief Observation of Symptoms of Autism (BOSA): Development of a New Adapted Assessment Measure for Remote Telehealth Administration through COVID-19 and Beyond 92%
- Resting and functional pupil response metrics indicate features of reward sensitivity and Autism Spectrum Disorder in children 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The lived experience of rejection sensitivity in ADHD - a qualitative exploration 93%
- Study protocol for the EYEdentify project: An examination of gaze behaviour in autistic adults using a virtual reality-based paradigm 92%
- Mindfulness supports emotional resilience in children during the COVID-19 Pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early joint attention abilities measured by the ADOS-2 predict subsequent expressive language development in minimally verbal autistic children 93%
- Early neurodevelopmental problems and risk for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in the general child population: a Japanese birth cohort study 92%
- Reward processing in children with Affective Dysregulation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal health around pregnancy and autism risk: a population-based study. 91%
- Coordination difficulties, IQ and psychopathology in children with high-risk Copy Number Variants 90%
- Approaches to improve mental health care for autistic children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.