Back

Clinical, sociodemographic, and genetic predictors of depressive episode duration in the UK Biobank

Schindler, L. S.; Singh, M.; Sheridan, E.; Lo, C. W. H.; Kamp, M.; Lewis, C. M.

2026-08-22 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.08.19.26360769 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The course of major depressive disorder is heterogeneous, with UK Biobank (UKB) participants reporting episode durations ranging from <1 month to >24 months. Here, we identify predictors of episode duration, characterise its genetic architecture, and examine links to treatment seeking and response. Methods: In UKB participants meeting criteria for major depressive disorder, we examined clinical, sociodemographic, and genetic predictors of short (0-3 months) and long (>24 months) episode duration, fitted in predictor-specific, domain-level, and combined models. We also conducted genome-wide association studies in European-ancestry participants (n = 40,858) and estimated common-variant heritability. Results: Clinical features were most informative: higher childhood trauma scores, a stressful trigger, and recurrence showed the most consistent associations with short and long durations across models (ORcombined: short = 0.75-0.95; long = 1.13-1.45; all p[&le;]0.02). Higher neuroticism scores were also associated with both durations (ORcombined: short = 0.977; long = 1.053; p<0.001). Polygenic risk for depression was associated with episode duration, though its independent contribution was modest. Long episodes were more predictable than short in validation analyses (AUC = 0.705 vs 0.601) and were associated with greater treatment engagement but lower perceived benefit; SNP-based heritability was nominally significant. Conclusions: Clinical features captured most of the predictable variance in episode duration, with the same predictors largely operating in opposite directions for short and long episodes, consistent with a continuum of chronicity. Those at risk for long episodes emerge as a priority for early identification and intervention.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.