Clinical, sociodemographic, and genetic predictors of depressive episode duration in the UK Biobank
Schindler, L. S.; Singh, M.; Sheridan, E.; Lo, C. W. H.; Kamp, M.; Lewis, C. M.
Show abstract
Background: The course of major depressive disorder is heterogeneous, with UK Biobank (UKB) participants reporting episode durations ranging from <1 month to >24 months. Here, we identify predictors of episode duration, characterise its genetic architecture, and examine links to treatment seeking and response. Methods: In UKB participants meeting criteria for major depressive disorder, we examined clinical, sociodemographic, and genetic predictors of short (0-3 months) and long (>24 months) episode duration, fitted in predictor-specific, domain-level, and combined models. We also conducted genome-wide association studies in European-ancestry participants (n = 40,858) and estimated common-variant heritability. Results: Clinical features were most informative: higher childhood trauma scores, a stressful trigger, and recurrence showed the most consistent associations with short and long durations across models (ORcombined: short = 0.75-0.95; long = 1.13-1.45; all p[≤]0.02). Higher neuroticism scores were also associated with both durations (ORcombined: short = 0.977; long = 1.053; p<0.001). Polygenic risk for depression was associated with episode duration, though its independent contribution was modest. Long episodes were more predictable than short in validation analyses (AUC = 0.705 vs 0.601) and were associated with greater treatment engagement but lower perceived benefit; SNP-based heritability was nominally significant. Conclusions: Clinical features captured most of the predictable variance in episode duration, with the same predictors largely operating in opposite directions for short and long episodes, consistent with a continuum of chronicity. Those at risk for long episodes emerge as a priority for early identification and intervention.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurocognitive deficits, psychotrauma, and inflammation shape major depressive disorder and its phenome features 96%
- ADHD in adults with recurrent depression 94%
- Which traits predict elevated distress during the Covid-19 pandemic? Results from a large, longitudinal cohort study with psychiatric patients and healthy controls 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunometabolic Blood Biomarkers of Developmental Trajectories of Depressive Symptoms: Findings From the ALSPAC Birth Cohort 95%
- Genetics of Major Depressive Disorder in a Homogeneous Population with Uniform Phenotyping 95%
- The genomic basis of mood instability: identification of 46 loci in 363,705 UK Biobank participants, genetic correlation with psychiatric disorders, and association with gene expression and function. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Major Depression Polygenic Risk Scores to Explore the Depressive Symptom Continuum 94%
- Sociodemographic, clinical, and genetic factors associated with self-reported antidepressant response outcomes in the UK Biobank 93%
- Psychological trauma and the genetic overlap between posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Latent subtypes of manic or irritable episode symptoms in two population-based cohorts 95%
- Smoking and the risk for bipolar disorder: causal evidence from a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study 92%
- Understanding Cognitive Impairment in Mood Disorders: Mediation Analyses in the UK Biobank Cohort 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple measures of depression to enhance validity of Major Depressive Disorder in the UK Biobank 96%
- Context Matters! Depression following childbirth or a chronic disease diagnosis shows specific risk factor profiles 95%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.