AlphaConformers: Structure-guided sampling enables prediction of multiple protein conformations
Daniel, J.; Vitoriano De Queiroz Lira, L.; Zea, D. J.
Show abstract
Proteins are dynamic molecules capable of adopting multiple conformations. However, AlphaFold2 predominantly generates models around a single conformation, usually representing a ligand-bound state. To address this limitation, we developed AlphaConformers, a structure-guided pipeline that steers AlphaFold2 toward alternative conformations. It is based on the idea that protein structure databases can capture the structural space accessible to members of a protein family. Given a target protein, AlphaConformers retrieves structures from structurally similar proteins. These structures are organized into structure-based alignments and template sets, which are supplied to AlphaFold2 as conformational hypotheses. The resulting models are clustered and filtered, facilitating their analysis. Evaluated on a curated benchmark of 88 proteins with known ligand-bound and unbound conformations, AlphaConformers expanded AlphaFold2 conformational sampling and recovered alternative states missed by AlphaFold2 and other state-of-the-art methods. AlphaConformers ranked first for modelling subtle conformational changes commonly observed between ligand-bound and unbound states. These results show that structural information from protein databases can be leveraged to steer AlphaFold2 toward alternative conformations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast Local Alignment of Protein Pockets (FLAPP): A system-compiled program for large-scale binding site alignment 95%
- PymolFold: A PyMOL Plugin for API-driven Structure Prediction and Quality Assessment 95%
- Rapid and accurate protein structure database search using inverse folding model and contrastive learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.