Metagenomic Sequencing for Wastewater-Based Surveillance: Modeling and Experimental Approaches for Determining Limit of Detection
Xiao, A.; Besse, K.; Connors, D.; Vian, T.; Stylinski, J.; Mannion, A.; Lacirignola, J.
Show abstract
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) has emerged as a key approach to assess community-level health and the evolution of pathogens. To date, most established WBS systems focus on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based detection and targeted sequencing of known pathogens because these approaches are well-accepted and include amplification of pathogen target sequences of interest thereby enabling lower limits of detection. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a promising approach to enable pathogen detection and surveillance beyond predefined pathogen lists, but its regular application to WBS has not been yet widely adopted because many key performance characteristics are not well-understood, including limit of detection (LOD) and false positive/negative rates. This paper describes a computational analysis to estimate the operational LOD of various sequencing approaches using a simplified model of a local wastewater (WW) system involving a military base. This paper also presents findings from two types of experiments: 1) laboratory-spiked, those for which Atlantibacter subterraneus (Asub) is introduced into real-world WW samples in a laboratory setting, and 2) system-spiked, those for which Asub is introduced at a source location of a real-world WW system. Findings indicate that mNGS detection performance varies with sequencing method and the data analysis process. In addition, findings indicate that site-specific method characterization should be used when implementing mNGS for WBS because sites can have different WW system configurations, background organisms and sequencing inhibitors.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Biomarkers Selection for Population Normalization in SARS-CoV-2 Wastewater-based Epidemiology 97%
- Sensitivity of wastewater-based epidemiology for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a low prevalence setting 97%
- SARS-CoV-2 RNA titers in wastewater anticipated COVID-19 occurrence in a low prevalence area 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applicability of Neighborhood and Building Scale Wastewater-Based Genomic Epidemiology to Track the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and other Pathogens 97%
- Performance evaluation of virus concentration methods for implementing SARS-CoV-2 wastewater based epidemiology emphasizing quick data turnaround 97%
- COVID-19 wastewater surveillance in rural communities: Comparison of lagoon and pumping station samples 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative Trend Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Municipal Wastewater Exemplified with Sewershed-Specific COVID-19 Clinical Case Counts 97%
- Improved Robustness of SARS-CoV-2 Whole-Genome Sequencing from Wastewater with a Nonselective Virus Concentration Method 96%
- Within-Day Variability of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Municipal Wastewater Influent During Periods of Varying COVID-19 Prevalence and Positivity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of SARS-Coronavirus-2 in wastewater, using the existing environmental surveillance network: An epidemiological gateway to an early warning for COVID-19 in communities. 96%
- Monitoring occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in school populations: a wastewater-based approach 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in US Wastewater: Leading Indicators and Data Variability Analysis in the 2023-2024 Season 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simultaneous detection and quantification of multiple pathogen targets in wastewater 97%
- Identifying trends in SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater to infer changing COVID-19 incidence: Effect of sampling frequency 96%
- Effect of SARS-CoV-2 digital droplet RT-PCR assay sensitivity on COVID-19 wastewater based epidemiology 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.