A Decolonial Exploration of Stakeholder Perspectives on Cameroons Expanded Programme on Immunisation: A Critical Qualitative Inquiry

Despite significant progress in reducing vaccine-preventable diseases, Cameroons Expanded Programme on Immunisation operates within structures shaped by colonial history. Overreliance on external donor funding, centralised governance, and limited recognition of local knowledge raise concerns about equity, local ownership, and programme sustainability, particularly as the country plans for donor transition and self-financing. This study, aligned with the decolonising global health movement, examines how colonial legacies shape stakeholders experiences within the EPI and proposes practical steps towards a more locally owned immunisation programme. A qualitative case study was conducted in the Southwest Region of Cameroon from June to July 2025, comprising fifteen online semi-structured interviews in English with selected stakeholders (regional and district EPI managers, civil society members, and community leaders). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically using Clarke and Brauns six-step framework in NVivo version 11. Participants identified subtle colonial influences, including centralised decision-making, donor-driven priorities, pay disparities favouring international actors over local staff, and the marginalisation of local and traditional knowledge. The COVID-19 response was frequently cited as an example of inequity, with Western biomedical approaches prioritised over locally led solutions. Major structural issues included heavy reliance on external funding, outdated colonial-era training curricula, centralised governance, and a lack of local vaccine manufacturing capacity. Despite these issues, participants recognised the significant technical and financial support from international organisations. They proposed concrete pathways for decolonisation, including decentralised governance, participatory programme design, regulation and integration of traditional medicine, community engagement, domestic resource mobilisation, leveraging Cameroons emerging universal health coverage to reduce donor dependence, and investing in local vaccine production. Conclusion: Colonial legacies continue to influence Cameroons EPI, undermining local ownership and self-determination, even when external support is effective. Achieving decolonisation requires multifaceted efforts to strengthen domestic financing and governance, empower local stakeholders, and legitimise local knowledge alongside biomedical approaches. Policymakers should embed local ownership, governance reforms, and local capacity building in transition strategies while donor funding persists, ensuring immunisation gains are sustained beyond external support. These insights provide a context-specific roadmap for developing a sustainable, equitable, and locally driven immunisation programme in Cameroon and other countries facing similar donor transitions.